My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
2013-10-28_REPORT - C1981012
DRMS
>
Day Forward
>
Report
>
Coal
>
C1981012
>
2013-10-28_REPORT - C1981012
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/24/2016 5:34:32 PM
Creation date
10/28/2013 1:33:02 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
C1981012
IBM Index Class Name
REPORT
Doc Date
10/28/2013
Doc Name
2012 Annual Hydrology Monitoring Report
From
New Elk Coal Company
To
DRMS
Annual Report Year
2012
Permit Index Doc Type
Hydrology Report
Email Name
LDS
SB1
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
135
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
October 2012 <br />3.0 HYDROLOGIC CONSEQUENCES <br />Page 3 -1 <br />Hydrologic consequences of mining activities are considered from two primary <br />perspectives: effects on water quantity and effects on water quality. These effects are addressed <br />through flow and water quality measurements of springs and seeps, streams and rivers, ponds <br />and direct discharges, and depths to water level and water quality of alluvial wells, and bedrock <br />wells. However, water quantity and quality are not independent functions of each other. Surface <br />water and groundwater quantities and water uses are components of the hydrologic balance of <br />the region. Natural water quality varies as a function of flows, type (groundwater or surface <br />water), and location. Discharge of underground mine water and runoff or discharge from mine <br />surface activities modify natural water quality. Analysis of potential impacts associated with <br />mining and refuse disposal has been completed and are contained in the mine permit document. <br />This report focuses on describing the water quality and quantity of the Purgatoire River, side <br />canyons and groundwater within the permit and adjacent areas. <br />3.1 Water Quantity <br />3.1.1 Springs and Seeps <br />Assessment of springs and seeps indicate that mine operations at the New Elk Mine have <br />not affected current uses of springs and seeps. Theoretically, these resources in the vicinity of <br />mining activity, especially over those areas of longwall mining, could be affected. There is some <br />potential for the loss of spring and seep flows into the underground mine workings by fracture <br />systems developed through land subsidence. No impacts to flow have been documented to date. <br />The monitoring requirement for these sites was terminated in 1999 with the liability release for <br />areas of underground mining. Spring and seep monitoring was not performed during the year. <br />Historic spring monitoring records are presented in Appendix C. <br />3.1.2 Purgatoire River System (Surface [Streams and Rivers], Ponds and direct Discharges, <br />and Alluvial Groundwater) <br />Use of the river in the area of the mine is limited to livestock watering, habitat for fish <br />and terrestrial wildlife, flood irrigation on bottom land terraces, and water supply for the New <br />Elk Mine preparation plant. Because of closure of the Golden Eagle Mine and no processing of <br />coal at the New Elk prep plant during the year, there was no consumptive water use at the mine. <br />The average water year runoff of the Purgatoire River at Madrid (USGS site 071244200) <br />between 1972 and 2011 is 50,320 ac -ft. Only 25,400 ac -ft of run -off occurred during the 2011 <br />water year. <br />There is a slight potential that flows in the Purgatoire River might be diminished by <br />recharge seepage into the mine along the river. Vertical permeability of the overburden on the <br />mine property has been estimated at 0.00021 ft per day (mine permit document). When this low <br />permeability is multiplied by the horizontal surface area of saturated alluvium in the area of the <br />mine, downward flows of water is estimated at 2.3 gpm. With the flow measured in the <br />Purgatoire River, this small water loss would not be detectable. Similarly, any loss in alluvial <br />groundwater would likely be undetected. Flows of the river replenish any alluvial groundwater <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.