My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
2013-10-21_REVISION - M1985112
DRMS
>
Day Forward
>
Revision
>
Minerals
>
M1985112
>
2013-10-21_REVISION - M1985112
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/16/2021 5:51:46 PM
Creation date
10/23/2013 8:55:16 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
M1985112
IBM Index Class Name
REVISION
Doc Date
10/21/2013
Doc Name
Second Adequacy Review
From
The Law Office of Joseph R. King
To
DRMS
Type & Sequence
TR1
Email Name
PSH
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
8
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
��4- <br />The Law Office of Joseph R. King <br />October 17, 2013 <br />Peter S. Hays <br />Environmental Protection Specialist <br />Division of Reclamation, Mining and Safety <br />Colorado Department of Natural Resources <br />1313 Sherman Street, Room 215 <br />Denver, CO 80203 <br />8778 Woff Court <br />Suite 204 <br />Westminster, CO 80031 <br />Office: 303 - 427 -2382 • Fax:303- 484 -4048 • jking @jrkinglaw.com <br />f:[-:C:--:%'E[) <br />Cr z 1 2013 <br />Division of Reclamation, <br />Mining & Safety <br />RE: Loloff Construction, Inc., Loloff Mine, Permit No. M- 1985 -112 <br />Technical Revision No. 1 (Tl 01) Second Adequacy Review <br />Mr. Hays: <br />I represent Loloff Construction, Inc. ( "Loloff'), and am working with J.C. York to address <br />concerns related to the request for a Technical Revision to Loloff Mine Permit No. M- 1985 -112. <br />My focus is to respond to items 22 and 24, as detailed in your letter to Mr. York dated July 23, <br />2013. <br />Item 22: Reclamation Costs <br />Mr. York will be providing an analysis of the cost to dewater the pit in phases in the event the <br />mine operator fails to complete operations and reclamation in conformance with the approved <br />mining plan. <br />I understand the concern is the cost to dewater the pit to establish a 3:1 slope at all areas that <br />have been disturbed. Loloff proposes that the mining and reclamation plan be amended to <br />include a requirement that a 3:1 slope be established as soon as reasonably possible after a <br />specific area has been disturbed. This would include establishing this slope at all locations that <br />have already been mined, in effect creating the reclamation condition as mining is being <br />conducted, rather than wait until mining is complete to establish this grade. This would <br />eliminate the need for the State to dewater the pit for purposes of establishing this same grade. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.