My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
2013-10-02_PERMIT FILE - C1981019A (3)
DRMS
>
Day Forward
>
Permit File
>
Coal
>
C1981019A
>
2013-10-02_PERMIT FILE - C1981019A (3)
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/24/2016 5:31:59 PM
Creation date
10/18/2013 8:51:20 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
C1981019A
IBM Index Class Name
Permit File
Doc Date
10/2/2013
Section_Exhibit Name
Rule 2 Permits -ST
Media Type
D
Archive
Yes
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
129
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
RULE 2 PERMITS <br />Detailed Surface Water Resource Information <br />Surface Water Characteristics -The South TaylodLower Wilson permit revision area includes the <br />drainages of Good Spring, Wilson, Taylor, and Jubb Creeks. Colowyo's existing mining operations exist <br />primarily in the Good Spring Creek drainage. Although Taylor Creek is a tributary to Wilson Creek, the <br />point of confluence is several miles downstream from the South Taylor/Lower Wilson permit revision <br />area, and thus Taylor Creek is examined as a separate drainage in this presentation. The principal <br />drainages within the permit revision area described below. <br />Good Sorin~ -_The Good Spring Creek watershed encompasses an area of about 35 square miles. <br />The drainage is characterized by steep sloping upland areas and narrow flat valley bottoms. Slopes <br />approaching or exceeding 50 percent are common, primarily due to the preponderance of exposed <br />bedrock strata (CDM, 1985b). Incision has created deep gullies in reaches locally within the permit <br />revision area, and bank sloughing is contributing to channel widening. Other, more stable reaches are <br />armored along the channel bottom by cobbles or exposed bedrock. Good Spring Creek has a higher <br />baseflow than other area creeks in part due to flow contributions from perennial springs in the West Fork <br />of Good Spring Creek. <br />Wilson Creek -The Wilson Creek watershed encompasses an area of about 20 square miles. Similar to <br />Good Spring Creek, the Wilson Creek drainage is characterized by narrow upland areas, steeply sloping <br />hillsides, and flat valley bottoms. The tributary channels are incised into bedrock. The valley bottom <br />exhibits morphologic evidence of historic landslide debris accumulation, which serves as a transporting <br />media for bedrock groundwater dischazge and side valley runoff to recharge surface water flows (CDM, <br />1985b). This recharge mechanism is illustrated by seeps along the banks of the stream. <br />. Taylor Creek -The Taylor Creek watershed encompasses an area of about 7.22 square miles. Slopes are <br />variable, ranging from 20 to 25 percent in the broad upland area in the highest portion of the watershed, <br />and generally steeper throughout the remainder of the basin leading to the valley bottom. Bedrock <br />stability in the area inhibits the accumulation of mass-wasting debris (CDM, 1985b). The channel is <br />relatively steep, typically greater than ten percent, and incision and bank sloughing are limited due [o the <br />bedrock control. <br />Surface Water Quantity -The South Taylor/Lower Wilson permit revision area extends from <br />Colowyo's existing mining operations in the Good Spring Creek watershed into [he Wilson Creek, Taylor <br />Creek, and Jubb Creek watersheds. Baseline monitoring was conducted from September 1996 through <br />September 1997 in each of these drainages. Additional baseline monitoring was conducted in March <br />1999 through August 2000 in Good Spring Creek. The Colorado Mined Land Reclamation Division's <br />Guidelines for the Collection of Baseline Water Quality Data were utilized during the baseline <br />monitoring. Water quality sampling and laboratory analyses were conducted in accordance with Rule <br />2.03.3(4) for analytes defined in Rule 2.04.7(2) and for analytes also listed in the CDMG Guidelines for <br />the Collection of Baseline Water Quality and Overburden Geochemistry. Field measurements for pH, <br />electrical conductivity, temperature, dissolved oxygen, and flow were monitored monthly. Quarterly <br />monitoring included a full suite of analyses at each location. Analysis for metals included only total <br />recoverable concentrations. <br /> <br />South Taylor/lower Wilson -Rule 2, Page 46 Revision Date: 11 /30/06 <br />Revision No.: PR-02 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.