2013-10-02_PERMIT FILE - C1981019A (3)

Home Browse Search

RULE 2 PERMITS • flows occurring during August through September ranged from 0.01 to 0.02 cfs, whereas high flows in May measured 1.87 cfs (CDM, 1985b). The drainage was dry during November. The flow data compiled by CDM for Good Spring Creek, Wilson Creek, and Taylor Creek correlates with the data compiled by the USGS and Brant Dennis. As part of the 1985 investigation, CDM also surveyed seeps and springs within the general area along Good Spring Creek, the West Fork of Good Spring Creek, and Wilson Creek, and areas in between (Map l0A). A total of 59 seeps and springs were observed during the inventory. Seeps and springs aze identified in Table 2.05.6-1 and -2. Four springs within the general azea appeared perennial: one on a western tributary to Wilson Creek (WCS-1), one on the eastern tributary to Wilson Creek (WCS-3), and two on tributaries to Good Spring Creek (WFS-2, JCS-1). The seeps and springs were monitored for field parameters on a monthly basis, and a single full-suite sample was collected at each location in May 1985. The monitoring data illustrate that springs contribute up to 1.9 cfs to surface flows in the West Fork of Good Spring Creek, and about 1 cfs to surface flows in the mainstem of Good Spring Creek during peak flow periods (CDM, 1985b). Contributions to surface flows from spring dischazge during baseflow periods were much less, ranging from 0.03 cfs to 0.06 cfs in the West Fork of Good Spring Creek, and 0.03 cfs in the mainstem (CDM, 1985b). Springs were also inventoried by JBR (1997). JBR identified 29 seeps and springs within areas that could be impacted by proposed mining. Some of these correspond with springs identified by CDM. Colowyo identified several additional springs in the mining impact areas. The spring information from all sources was consolidated and 21 spring sampling locations were identified and proposed to the CDMG for the South Taylor impact area. The CDMG approved of the selected spring locations in 1999. Five springs in the Lower Wilson area were also identified and aze presented in this application. • Surface Water Quality -Water quality data for streams and springs that is relevant to this permit revision are summarized in tables 2.04.7-30, 2.04.7-34, and 2.04.7-35. Several surface water investigations have been performed in the general area. These are discussed in the following paragraphs. Engineering Science measured parameters in area streams and springs from 1978 through 1982 (ES, 1982). The report concluded that Taylor, Good Spring, and Wilson creeks all have variable water quality that depends on season. Background levels of metals indicate acute and chronic toxicity to aquatic life in all drainages. It further concluded that levels of metals in surface water may affect agricultural uses, and that high metal and sulfates may preclude the use of surface water for potable water supplies. CDM investigated surface water quality of the streams in the general area covering a 12-month span from August 1984 through July 1985. Surface water monitoring locations were established in Good Spring Creek, Wilson Creek, and Taylor Creek as part of these studies. Generally, the surface water in Good Spring Creek is amagnesium-sulfate type with calcium and bicarbonate also occurring in significant concentrations. The TDS ranges from 713 mg/L to 1,500 mg/L (CDM, 1985b). TDS concentrations were inversely proportional to flow; TDS was highest during low flow conditions in the stream, primarily occurring during the winter months. Most of the springs sampled in the Good Spring Creek drainage by CDM were amagnesium-sulfate water type. TDS values ranged from less than 1,000 mg/L to neazly 5,000 mg/L (CDM, 1985b). Springs sampled in the Wilson Creek drainage were lower in TDS, and had higher proportions of calcium and bicarbonate. Water quality in Wilson Creek is a mixed cation, mixed anion type, with sodium and chloride the . dominant ions in the fall and winter months, and calcium, magnesium, and sulfates the dominant ions in the spring. TDS ranged from 554 mg/L to 2,li0 mg/L (CDM, 1985b). TDS concentrations were also South TaylodLower Wilson -Rule 2, Page 44 RaVI$ion Date: 3~30~07 Revision No.: PR-02