My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
2013-10-02_PERMIT FILE - C1981019A (3)
DRMS
>
Day Forward
>
Permit File
>
Coal
>
C1981019A
>
2013-10-02_PERMIT FILE - C1981019A (3)
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/24/2016 5:31:59 PM
Creation date
10/18/2013 8:51:20 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
C1981019A
IBM Index Class Name
Permit File
Doc Date
10/2/2013
Section_Exhibit Name
Rule 2 Permits -ST
Media Type
D
Archive
Yes
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
129
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
RULE 2 PERMITS <br />General Groundwater Quantity -Groundwater monitoring in the general and South Taylor/Lower <br />Wilson permit azea has been conducted since 1983. Monitoring wells have been established in [he <br />alluvium, the Williams Fork Formation interburden and coal, and the Trout Creek Sandstone. A <br />summary of the bedrock and shallow monitoring wells relevant to the permit revision is presented in <br />tables 2.04.7-25 through 2.04.7-29 and are shown on Map 10A. Locations of all known wells and test <br />boreholes within the permit area and adjacent area are illustrated on Map 11A. <br />Previous studies by CDM (1985a) and Dennis (2001, 2006) determined the hydraulic characteristics of <br />the bedrock aquifers in the Williams Fork Formation and the Trout Creek Sandstone. The results of these <br />studies are presented in Table 2.04.7-26 and discussed in detail below. The Trout Creek Sandstone is a <br />moderately permeable confined aquifer and the Williams Fork Formation is mostly dry with a few, low <br />permeability, discontinuous, and confined aquifers of limited extent. <br />Alluvial aquifers have moderate to high permeability where encountered, with a wide range of hydraulic <br />values encountered. There is little groundwater in the alluvium along Wilson Creek immediately below <br />the Lower Wilson affected area. There is groundwater in the alluvium along the West Fork and main <br />stems of Good Spring Creek below the South Taylor affected area. <br />General Groundwater Quality -Bedrock water quality (Williams Fork Formation and Trout Creek <br />Sandstone) in the general area was determined by previous investigations (CDM, 1985a; Dennis, 2001; <br />Colowyo 1992). Data from these investigations indicate that the principal water type in the Williams <br />Fork Formation is a calcium- or sodium-bicarbonate type water, containing only minor concentrations of <br />other major ions. The concentration of total dissolved solids (TDS) is low to moderate, ranging from 440 <br />milligrams per liter (mg/L) to 640 mg/L (CDM, 1985a). The CDM investigation revealed that the water <br />type of the Trout Creek Sandstone is more variable than that of the Williams Fork Formation. TDS <br />concentrations ranged from 600 mg/L to 710 mg/L, and the water type ranged from asodium-sulfate, <br />sodium-bicarbonate type, to a predominantly mixed cation-bicarbonate type water with equal percentages <br />of calcium, magnesium, and sodium (CDM, 1985a). The water quality of the bedrock during [he 1985 <br />investigation did not exhibit significant seasonal variability. <br />The water quality of the alluvium in the general area was also investigated by CDM in 1985. These <br />investigations revealed two distinct trends in water quality: a temporal uniformity in water type, in the <br />relative percentages of major cations and anions, and general variability in the water quality from well to <br />well. The water type is predominantly amagnesium-sulfate type, with moderate to high concentrations of <br />TDS, ranging from 645 mg/L to 3,780 mg/L (CDM, 1985a). In contrast to the water quality of the <br />bedrock, the alluvial water quality showed significant seasonal variation in the majority of [he wells <br />sampled, with TDS concentrations increasing in the spring. <br />General Groundwater Use -Groundwater withdrawals in the Lower Yampa River basin totaled nearly <br />one million gallons per day (mgd) in 1995 (USGS 1995). Groundwater consumption in the basin is <br />predominantly associated with irrigation use. About 52 percent of the groundwater withdrawals (0.5 <br />mgd) are used for irrigation. Livestock and mining use account for the remaining groundwater <br />withdrawals. <br /> <br />South Taylor/L.ower Wilson -Rule 2, Page 38 Revision Date: 11/30/06 <br />Revision No.: PR-02 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.