Laserfiche WebLink
10/15/13 State.co.us Executive Branch Mail - Fwd: Southfield Mine: MWNW & Pond 4 <br />Date: Tue, Jun 25, 2013 at 12:01 PM <br />Subject: Re: Vento Coal Mine /Pond #4 <br />To: George Patterson <efcoal @gmail.com <br />HI George, <br />Just a clarification. The signatures of all the trustees do not have to be on one letter, but EFCI <br />would need to have all trustees original signatures. 4 letters with the same wording is <br />acceptable. <br />An e -mail is acceptable for EFCI to start putting together a TR to make a permanent pond <br />demonstration, but DRMS needs "legal or equitable" owner of record to sign in order for DRMS <br />to approve a pond to remain on their land. <br />(Rule 3.03.1(3)(c)- provisions for sound future maintenance by the permitee or landowner, <br />4.05.9, and 2.05.5(1)(b)) <br />Janet H Binns <br />Environmental Protection Specialist III <br />Colorado Division of Reclamation, Mining and Safety <br />1313 Sherman Street, Room 215 <br />Denver, CO 80203 <br />office: 303.866.3567 ext. 8107 <br />email: janet.binns @state.co.us <br />On Tue, Jun 25, 2013 at 11:01 AM, George Patterson <efcoal @gmail.com> wrote: <br />Hello Paula, <br />am in receipt of your email about Pond #4 however, after speaking to Janet Binns, she <br />stated all four of the owners in the Vento group would have to sign the letter of request to <br />keep the pond permanently and that all four of the signatures need to be on the one /same <br />letter. <br />believe you can send your letter either to here to EF or to the Division. <br />Regards, <br />George P <br />On Sun, Jun 23, 2013 at 4:21 PM, <paulacoulter @comcast.net> wrote: <br />June 23,2013 <br />https: / /mail.g oog le.conVmai I /u /0 / ?ui =2 &i Ire29129fcb5 &view = pt &search =i nbox&th =141 bcef852l d94a5 18/20 <br />