My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
2013-10-07_REVISION - C1981025 (8)
DRMS
>
Day Forward
>
Revision
>
Coal
>
C1981025
>
2013-10-07_REVISION - C1981025 (8)
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/24/2016 5:32:14 PM
Creation date
10/8/2013 9:24:25 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
C1981025
IBM Index Class Name
Revision
Doc Date
10/7/2013
Doc Name
Proposed Decision and Findings of Compliance
From
DRMS
To
Minrec Inc
Type & Sequence
RN6
Email Name
BFB
SB1
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
28
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Disturbed surface areas from mining operations have been reclaimed. The <br />operator demonstrated in Bond Release SL-04 that contributions of suspended <br />solids from these reclaimed areas are not greater that contributions from adjacent <br />undisturbed areas. There has been no recorded overland surface flow from <br />reclaimed disturbed areas of the permit to North Thompson Creek. <br /> <br />All former sediment control structures have been reclaimed, or permitted for <br />retention for other purposes. The determination was made in Bond Releases SL- <br />4, SL-5 and SL-6 that there is no adverse impact to surface waters by surface <br />runoff from the mine site. <br /> <br />(b) Flows from Mine Portals <br /> <br />Seepage was noted in the vicinity of the No. 1 Mine portals on April 28, 1988. This <br />water was determined to require treatment (a pH of 6.8, suspended solids of <br />2,180 mg/1, and recoverable iron at 120.6 mg/1). Collection systems were <br />installed, and discharge was treated by a drip hydroxide system to lower the <br />pH and precipitate the iron, with detention. The drip system was determined to <br />be unnecessary; detention without chemical treatment was sufficient. This flow <br />now comes from the No. 1 Mine airshaft and is conveyed to the current <br />passive treatment system. The current treatment system consists of collection and <br />transmission pipes, and a series of ponds (Long Pond, Treatment Pond 1, <br />Treatment Pond 2, and the option for additional treatment in Pond P-9). There is <br />no mixing of surface runoff from disturbed areas with these mine water <br />discharges. Water from the mine water treatment ponds bypasses sediment ponds <br />and is discharged to North Thompson Creek at CDPS Outfall 001. The locations <br />of the portal areas, the mine water collection system, and treatment ponds are <br />shown on Drawing D-3-2 of the PAP. <br /> <br />Analyses on September 8 and October 12, 2002 of the untreated discharge from <br />the No. 1 Mine indicated that the untreated discharge met water quality <br />parameters of the CDPS permit requirements without treatment in the detention <br />ponds. However, the discharge continues to pass through the detention ponds and <br />discharge at Outfall 001. <br /> <br />Prior to the middle of 1995, the mine water discharge at Mine No. 3 was from a <br />point source inflow (spring) within the mine. This spring discharge, consistently <br />less than 10 gallons per minute, was of good quality and, from 1986 to mid 1995, <br />was slightly alkaline with no history of iron or sediment problems. It was piped to <br />the surface and discharged directly to North Thompson Creek at a former CDPS <br />discharge point 007. Groundwater inflows began to fill Mine No. 3 after cessation <br />of mining and pumping. Flooded mine waters nearly discharged in 1993 (rose to <br />near-portal elevation), but then resided. From 1991 through1993, iron (total) <br />concentrations in the spring flow were below 0.02 mg/1. Concentrations of iron <br />in the spring discharge rose from values around 0.02 mg/1 on April 30, 1994, to <br />0.055 mg/1 on May 16, 1995, and a significant increase in discharge flow rate and <br />concentrations of some parameters was noted on June 26, 1995. Mine water <br />elevation measurements indicated that the No. 3 Mine had flooded to the portal <br /> <br /> <br />17 <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.