My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
2013-09-20_GENERAL DOCUMENTS - M1977004
DRMS
>
Day Forward
>
General Documents
>
Minerals
>
M1977004
>
2013-09-20_GENERAL DOCUMENTS - M1977004
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/24/2016 5:25:17 PM
Creation date
9/25/2013 8:17:09 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
M1977004
IBM Index Class Name
GENERAL DOCUMENTS
Doc Date
9/20/2013
Doc Name
Pitch Project
From
USFS
To
DRMS
Permit Index Doc Type
General Correspondence
Email Name
RCO
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
28
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
ALTERNATIVES <br />One action alternative was analyzed in detail in the EA along with the No Action alternative. The <br />alternatives analyzed in detail in the EA are- summarized below: <br />Alternative 1 - Proposed Action <br />In exchange for one parcel containing 700.4 acres of reserved public domain status NFS land, the <br />United States would acquire a portion of the 945.15 -acre non - federal parcel referred to as Fossil <br />Ridge and owned by TPL. Homestake Mining Company has proposed an equal value land <br />exchange, where the value of the FP parcel would equal the value of the NFP. In order to equalize <br />values, the size of the private parcel will be modified so that FP's appraised value matches the <br />NFP's appraised value. <br />TPL and the Forest Service have agreed to prioritize acquisition of the NFP starting with the <br />western 320.25 acres of Tract 38 and after that from the eastern boundary of Tract 37 (nearest to the <br />Fossil Ridge Recreation Area) and proceeding west. <br />Alternative 2 -- No Action <br />The current landownership pattern within the analysis area would remain the same. The proposed <br />exchange between the Forest Service and Homestake Mining Company would not occur under this <br />alternative at this time. Selection of this alternative would not preclude consideration of either the <br />FP or the NFP in a future land adjustment proposal (i.e. exchange, donation or purchase). <br />Other Alternatives Considered, but eliminated from detail analysis included: <br />Acquire Non - Federal Lands through Direct Purchase <br />The Forest Service considered the alternative of acquiring the NFP by direct purchase from the <br />owner. However, this alternative was dropped from further consideration because it would not fully <br />meet the purpose and need for action. Since there would be no disposal of federal lands some <br />aspects of the purpose and need would not be achieved. <br />THE DECISION <br />Considerable effort was made toward configuring an exchange that would best meet needs of <br />the public. I have reviewed the,environmental analysis for the Fossil Ridge I land exchange as <br />proposed by Homestake Mining Company of California. Based upon the information <br />contained within that analysis I have selected Alternative 1— Proposed Action as my preferred <br />alternative. I have determined that there is clearly a benefit to the. public, both now and in the <br />future, by selecting Alternative 1- Proposed Action, which is to proceed with the acquisition of <br />the 945.15 acres of private inholdings and the disposal of the 700.4 acres of NFS land. I <br />Fossil Ridge I Land Exchange Decision Notice and FONSI 4 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.