My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
2013-09-22_INSPECTION - M1977193
DRMS
>
Day Forward
>
Inspection
>
Minerals
>
M1977193
>
2013-09-22_INSPECTION - M1977193
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/24/2016 5:25:20 PM
Creation date
9/24/2013 5:17:13 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
M1977193
IBM Index Class Name
INSPECTION
Doc Date
9/22/2013
Doc Name
Inspection 6/2013
From
DRMS
To
Operator
Inspection Date
6/20/2013
Email Name
TC1
TAK
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
8
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
PERMIT #: M- 1977 -193 <br />INSPECTOR'S INITIALS: TC 1 <br />INSPECTION DATE: June 20, 2013 <br />ensure that slope failure or raveling erosion will not move beyond the permit boundary. Additionally, care <br />should be given to leave the final highwall in a condition that will minimize local failures and rockfall from the <br />highwall face. <br />The contact between the Precambrian gneisses and the sedimentary strata to the east is of particular concern, <br />since this contact is known to be a weak zone prone to failure both along the contact strike, and also across the <br />bedding plain as evident in the failure in the quarry to the north of the site, and the smaller -scale failure onsite <br />north of the area currently being mined. The final highwall design along areas were this contact will be exposed <br />will need to include more conservative evaluation and design. <br />On -going slope stability monitoring of the highwall should be conducted following the final configuration for <br />each mine phase. The monitoring should continue until there is reasonable evidence that the section of highwall <br />is in a stable configuration, which will depend on the geology, topography, highwall orientation, and observed <br />conditions in the monitoring data, likely a minimum of 5 years. <br />PHOTOGRAPHS <br />Photo 1. The seep area (yellow circle). <br />Page 3 of 8 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.