Laserfiche WebLink
Geotechnical Engineering Report l�err� con <br />Great Western Sugar • Greeley, Colorado <br />January 17, 2011 . Terracon Project No 21105019 <br />4.0 LABORATORY TEST RESULTS & ENGINEERING PROPERTIES <br />As requested by the client, samples were obtained from Boring No. 1 at depths of approximately <br />20 feet and 45 feet below existing grade, and from Boring No. 2 at a depth of approximately 25 <br />feet below existing grade. Moisture, density, and strength testing was requested on each <br />sample. As shown on the grain size distribution data presented ion Exhibit B -2, we encountered <br />soils with significant amounts of % -inch to 2 -inch or larger diameter gravel particles at the <br />requested sampling depths in Boring No. 1. Typical soil strength laboratory testing including <br />direct shear, triaxial, or unconfined compressive strength testing is not appropriate for these <br />types of soils. We elected to perform soil classification testing of these soils and correlate the <br />soil classification information with typical soil strength parameters. We performed direct shear <br />testing of the sample collected from Boring No. 2. The table below summarizes our test results <br />as well as ranges of recommended shear strength parameters for the soils encountered. <br />Sample <br />Soil Classification <br />Moisture <br />Dry Density Internal Angle <br />Cohesion (psf) <br />I.D. <br />(USCS, AASHTO) <br />Content ( %) <br />(pcf) of Friction (deg) <br />1 e20' <br />GP, A -1 -a <br />20 -25 <br />115 -120 - 40-45 <br />0 <br />1 @ 45' <br />SW -SM, A -1 -b <br />20 -25 <br />T 115 -120 rt 32 -36' <br />0' - <br />2 @ 25 <br />GP, A--l----a <br />27 <br />118 28 <br />731 <br />1—Estimated <br />values based on soil classification, relative density, and our experience with similar soil <br />Direct shear testing was performed for the sample collected from Boring No 2 at a depth of <br />about 25 feet in general accordance with ASTM D 3080. For direct shear testing, we remolded <br />the sample at approximately 3 percent greater than optimum moisture content at a density of <br />about 95 percent of the maximum dry density as determined by ASTM D 698. Based on our <br />experience with similar soil types, cohesion values are typically zero (0) pounds per square foot <br />(psf) for gravels with less than 20 percent passing the No. 200 sieve. Additionally, the internal <br />angle of friction is typically between 40 and 45 degrees for medium dense gravels with less than <br />20 percent passing the No. 200 sieve. Therefore, we believe the direct shear test results for the <br />sample collected from Boring No 2 (Sample I D. 2 @ 25' shown in the table above) are not <br />typical for this type of material and we recommend using the ranges of soil parameters shown <br />for site soils presented in the table above (Sample I.D.'s 1 @ 20' and 1 @ 45'). <br />Consideration should be given to the shear strength parameters used for design on the project. <br />Actual test values should be used in conjunction with published ranges of values based on soil <br />classifications, relative densities, and experience. We believe the shear strength parameters <br />listed in the table above are appropriate for the soils encountered in our borings at this site. <br />Reliable . Responsive . Convenient . innovative <br />