Laserfiche WebLink
Page 4 of 5 <br />east at 400 -450 feet deep. <br />DRMS response: This fact does not discredit EFCI's monitoring of water elevations and quality <br />of subsurface water found in the Red Arrow and Dirty Jack O' Lantern coal seams. The Division <br />finds that the Southfield Mine is in compliance with Rule 2.04.7, Rule 4.05.1(1) and 4.05.1(2). <br />11. Act 120(2)0)(II)(a): "That in no case shall Federal or State water quality standards be violated" <br />DRMS response: No information was included to indicate which State or Federal water quality <br />standards are being violated. <br />12. Rule 4.05.8 regarding drainage from acid - forming and toxic - forming spoil or underground <br />development waste into ground or surface water shall be avoided. <br />DRMS response: There is no evidence of any acid - forming or toxic — forming drainage from the <br />designed and constructed Refuse Disposal Area. Pond 4 remains in place, but rarely contains any <br />water from runoff from the RDA. There has been no record of Pond 4 discharging since the mine <br />was reclaimed. MW -10 is located immediately west of the RDA and was previously monitored <br />prior to subsurface failure of this monitoring well. MW -10 had been drilled to 402 feet and <br />measured perforated interval from 342 -402 feet (Pine Gulch coal seam, Upper and Middle Jack <br />O' Lantern coal seams). There are 342 feet of interbedded sandstones, siltstones, mudstones, <br />shale and coal seams between the coal refuse disposal area (RDA) and the Southfield Mine <br />workings. There is no reason to believe that there is any toxic or acid forming drainage from the <br />RDA into subsurface water. Exhibit 08 contains the drilling record for MW -10, previously <br />identified as SR -10. The drilling record did not record encountering any water in the strata from <br />the surface to the bottom of the drill hole in this location. For additional discussion of this topic, <br />please see Southfield permit page 2.05.4 -27a and Exhibit 09. <br />13. Your August 21, 2013 objection expressed concern regarding Ground Water Recharge capability <br />and cited Rule 4.05.12 and Act 120(2)0)(IV). The objection letter stated that, "MW23 has been <br />drawn down by 50 feet recently and MW65 is drawn down also." <br />DRMS response: Please review the Division's June 3, 2013 memo, as this provides an <br />explanation of the hydro - geology in the Southfield Mine area. <br />14. MW23 at 145 feet is not and has not tested the groundwater quality or quantity, but is testing <br />water in the Red Arrow Coal Seam at 150'. The Groundwater is at 400 -450' based on wells <br />drilled by Larry Finney, Finney Drilling and John Reeves, Reeves Drilling. <br />DRMS response: As described in section 2.04.7 of the Southfield permit and in Exhibit 25, MW- <br />23 is completed up- gradient from the Southfield workings, and finished to a depth of 179 feet. <br />The perforated interval is from 149 feet to 170 feet in the Upper and Lower Red Arrow seam. <br />Please read the groundwater description in the Southfield Permit, Section 2.04.7, Section 2.05.6, <br />Protection of Groundwater Recharge Capacity; Section 4.05.12, Probable Hydrologic <br />Consequence; 2.05.6(3)(b)(iii). <br />15. A new monitoring well into the groundwater needs to be drilled by EF to determine what the <br />status of the groundwater in the only upslope monitoring well that in an area that has not been <br />undermined and away from old mines nearby. This new monitoring well needs to continue to be <br />monitored until the reclamation period is over. <br />