Laserfiche WebLink
<br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />II <br /> <br />I <br />I <br />'I <br />I <br />I <br /> <br />3. Operation ofreallocated storage in Chatfield Reservoir to meet Denver Water's <br />demand schedule produced the greatest average increase in Chatfield Reservoir <br />water surface elevations (approximately 9 feet for the 20,600 acre-feet reallocated <br />storage pool) and operation for the South Metro participants resulted in the least <br />average increase in water surface elevations (approximately 3.5 feet for the <br />20,600 acre-feet pool). <br /> <br />4. It will be necessary for those entities that are concerned with increased reservoir <br />water surface elevations in Chatfield Reservoir resulting from storage reallocation <br />to carefully review the results presented in Figures l-E through l5-E herein to <br />determine the increased frequency of higher reservoir water surface elevations. <br /> <br />5. During the study period, there are drought years in which there was no water <br />available for storage in the reallocated storage pools. During these drought years, <br />consequently, there would be no effect on reservoir water surface elevations from <br />reallocation of storage space. <br /> <br />6. To further explore feasibility for Chatfield storage reallocation, the Corps should <br />perform a detailed hydraulic analysis to determine the effects that storage <br />reallocation would have on the flood control function of the reservoir. This <br />analysis should also consider potential environmental and recreational impacts <br />from increased pool size. <br /> <br />P:\Data\GEN\CWCB\Chatfield\Report12.02\RevisedChatReportl 03\Report2-03 .doc <br /> <br />5 <br />