Laserfiche WebLink
<br />I <br />I I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br /> <br />The potential reallocated storage pools specified in the Work Plan (Colorado Department of <br />Natural Resources Colorado Water Conservation Board, December 2001, see Appendix A <br />herein) for analysis were: 2,900 acre-feet (5,434 ft. MSL), 4,500 acre-feet (5,435 ft. MSL), 7,700 <br />acre-feet (5,437 ft. MSL) and 20,600 (5,444 ft. MSL) acre-feet. These values were pre-selected <br />by the Corps based on previous reservoir routing studies. In the course of this investigation, <br />considerable effort was expended in determining whether a larger reallocated storage pool should <br />be investigated. After additional calculations, meetings with the Study Advisory Group and <br />meetings with the Omaha District, U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, and the CWCB it was <br />determined to use the four storage pools specified in the Work Plan for this investigation. <br /> <br />The results from simulation analysis of the 4,500 acre storage pool were, for practical purposes, <br />indistinguishable from the results obtained for the 7,700 acre-feet pool. Therefore, only the <br />results from the simulation studies for the 2,900, 7,700 and 20,600 acre-feet pools are reported <br />herein. <br /> <br />It is important to note that the maximum reallocated storage volume of20,600 acre-feet may be <br />increased or decreased when the final proposed Chatfield operating rules are determined using <br />the Corps HEC-5 reservoir routing model, not yet completed. The analysis described in this <br />report to determine the effects ofthe maximum reallocated storage pool on reservoir fluctuation <br />and the efficiency of storage use could be repeated for the revised maximum storage pool. For <br />purposes of this investigation, these reallocated storage pools were placed on top of Denver <br />Water's operating pool, which has a normal level of 5,432 MSL (27,428 acre-feet). <br /> <br />Sixteen potential users of the storage pool were identified and are listed in the report. These <br />potential users fall into four general categories: <br /> <br />I. Municipal water suppliers, <br /> <br />2. Entities requiring augmentation water, primarily for replacing out of priority <br />depletions from irrigation, <br /> <br />3. Entities concerned with maintaining minimum instream flows in the South Platte <br />River, and <br /> <br />4. Municipal and industrial (M&I) and conjunctive use water users. <br /> <br />Available water rights for storage in Chatfield Reservoir storage were inventoried from <br />II entities. For purposes of this investigation, specific water rights, which were judged to be <br />representative of the municipal water supply, augmentation water, instream flow and M&I and <br />conjunctive use user categories, were used to estimate potential inflow to Chatfield Reservoir for <br />each of these categories. <br /> <br />Five demand scenarios were developed for purposes of specifying target release schedules: <br /> <br />1. Municipal water supply. The demand scenario and target release schedules used <br />in this investigation were based on data provided by Denver Water where the <br />primary use would be for drought contingency storage for municipal water <br />supply. <br /> <br />P:\Data\GEN\CWCB\Chatfield\ReportI2.02\RevisedChatReportl 03\Report2-03 .doc <br /> <br />2 <br />