My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Search
FLOOD11631 (2)
CWCB
>
Floodplain Documents
>
DayForward
>
1100
>
FLOOD11631 (2)
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/26/2010 10:25:18 AM
Creation date
1/5/2009 2:44:37 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Floodplain Documents
County
Costilla
Community
Costilla County
Stream Name
Rio Grande, Trinchera Creek, Culebra Creek, Costi
Basin
Rio Grande
Title
Floodplain Information Report - Costilla County
Date
3/1/1989
Prepared For
Costilla County, CWCB
Floodplain - Doc Type
Floodplain Report/Masterplan
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
44
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
4.0 HYDRAULIC ANALYSTS <br />Tn view of the size of Costilla County and the limited <br />amount of time and money available fo~ preparing floodplain <br />delineations for the county, approximate methods of hydraulic <br />analysis were selected. <br />4.1 Base Maps <br />7 1/2 minute U.S.G.S. quadrangle maps were used as base <br />topographic maps to show the 100-year floodplain. 21 <br />quadrangle maps were used to provide base mapping for the study <br />area. Of these 21 quadrangles, 6 had a contour interval of 40 <br />feet, 6 had a contour interval of ZO feet (with 1 of those <br />having selected intermediate 10 foot contours and 1 having <br />selected intermediate 5 foot contours), 8 had a contour <br />interval of 10 feet (with 2 of those Yaaving selected <br />intermediate 5 foot contours). and 1 had a contour interval of <br />5 feet. <br />In the San Luis study area field ~urveyed cross-sections <br />were superimposed on a blown-up version of the San Luis <br />quadrangle. Likewise, the CSU Maps of Floodprone Areas were <br />prepared by superimposing field-surveyed cross-sections ora <br />quadranqle maps. In the case of the CSU maps, however, the <br />cross-sections were far less detailed and much more widely <br />spaced than those used for the San Luis study. <br />4.2 Flood Depths <br />The basic procedure for floodplain mapping was to determine <br />a representative depth of flooding for the 100-year peak flow <br />based on an elevation-discharge relationship. That depth was <br />assumed to be constant for a given stream reach. Flood <br />contours were drawn on the maps, and the boundary was <br />determined by connecting the end-points of the f~ood contaurs. <br />The key step in this process was to determine appropria~e <br />flood depths. The first sources of information for this <br />selection were the gage analyses perfarmed by the various <br />governmental agencies. These analyses generally included flood <br />staqes for the calculated 100-year flow. The second set of <br />data sources was a set of typical cross-sections that were <br />derived from the base maps (usually 10' contour intervals were <br />used). Hyd.raulic calculations were performed for these <br />cross-sections. In the area around the Town of San Luis, the <br />elevation-discharge relationships determined in the December, <br />1988 report, Master Drainaqe Studv, Town of San Luis, Colorado, <br />were used. From these analyses draft maps were prepared. <br />Final depths of flooding could not be selected until a field <br />revbew of these draft maps had been conducted. <br />-30- <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.