My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Search
SPDSS_Task48-2_AlluvialGroundwaterModelingCalibration
CWCB
>
Decision Support Systems
>
DayForward
>
SPDSS_Task48-2_AlluvialGroundwaterModelingCalibration
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
4/17/2013 9:26:40 AM
Creation date
8/11/2008 1:11:50 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Decision Support Systems
Title
SPDSS Task 48.2 - Development of Calibration Targets and Criteria - Phase 4
Description
This Technical Memorandum was undertaken under Task 48.2 of Phase 4 of the SPDSS, to develop calibration criteria, including selection of field data (targets) to be used during the model calibration. This TM summarizes the methodology and data that are anticipated to be used in the model calibration process.
Decision Support - Doc Type
Task Memorandum
Date
10/8/2008
DSS Category
Groundwater
DSS
South Platte
Basin
South Platte
Contract/PO #
C153953
Grant Type
Non-Reimbursable
Bill Number
SB01-157, HB02-1152, SB03-110, HB04-1221, SB05-084, HB06-1313, SB07-122
Prepared By
CDM
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
31
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
3.5.3 Other Non-Numeric Calibration Targets <br />Other information will be used to evaluate model calibration. These are termed non-numeric <br />criteria for the purposes of this TM, since they will not be included as part of tlne model <br />calibration objective function. Each of tlne following targets will be evaluated using engineering <br />judgment to assist in identify>ing the best combination of model >lnput parameters. hn some cases <br />the targets will be evaluated against quantitative metrics, discussed in Section 4.1. <br />• Random geographic distribution of head, streamflow and stream ga>ln/loss residuals <br />• Comparison of simulated and observed diversions <br />• Number and location of flooded and dry cells <br />• Correspondence between simulated and mapped areas of groundwater <br />evapotranspiration <br />These types of data are not readily suited for automated parameter estination techniques. <br />Some of the targets listed above are estimated or derived values that have a higher level of <br />uncertainty than the measured parameters of water level (head) and streamflow. In addition, <br />most of tlne targets listed above are affected by changes in head and streamflow, so including <br />them in the automated parameter estimation process would be redundant. These non-numeric <br />targets will provide another means to evaluate how well calibrated is a given model rtun. They <br />are considered a lower priority than tlne targets used in tlne automated parameter estimation <br />process described in previous sections but still important elements of the model calibration. <br />3.6 Development of Target Database <br />Water level and stream flow data used lln the calibration and validation processes resides iln <br />HydroBase and will be extracted and processed unto a format suitable for use in the calibration <br />process. The stream gain/loss >lnformation will be compiled from the Task 46 TM. The data <br />used for calibration will >lnclude: <br />Water elevation observations at specified well locations, <br />Streamflow observations at specified streamflow gaging stations, <br />Stream gain/loss. <br />4.0 Calibration Criteria <br />The objective of tlne calibration process is to obta>In acceptable agreement between model <br />calculated values and their correspond>ing measured values. Tlne calibration process <br />systematically varies model parameters within predeternnined ranges based on site data and <br />engineering judgment to obtain this agreement. Typically, the model parameters with the <br />greatest uncertainty, includ>nng those that are not easily measured or can have significant spatial <br />variability (such as aquifer hydraulic conductivity) are used for adjustment iIn calibration. The <br />input parameters that will be adjusted during tlne calibration process are discussed in Section 2. <br />Calibration criteria are defined in this TM as tlne threshold values used to deternnine wlnetlner <br />the model is sufficiently accurate. The criteria are the maximum differences between simulated <br />P~ SPDSS T~8 2 Final TM 10-08-0t~.doc 15 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.