My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Search
SPDSS_Task64_ReviewDevelopPrecipitationRechargeEstimates
CWCB
>
Decision Support Systems
>
DayForward
>
SPDSS_Task64_ReviewDevelopPrecipitationRechargeEstimates
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
4/17/2013 9:36:20 AM
Creation date
6/11/2008 2:20:57 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Decision Support Systems
Title
SPDSS Task 64 - Review and Develop Precipitation Recharge Estimates
Description
This memorandum presents the general approach used to develop monthly precipitation recharge estimates for both the Denver Basin and South Platte alluvial ground water models.
Decision Support - Doc Type
Task Memorandum
Date
5/11/2007
DSS Category
Groundwater
DSS
South Platte
Basin
South Platte
Contract/PO #
C153953
Grant Type
Non-Reimbursable
Bill Number
SB01-157, HB02-1152, SB03-110, HB04-1221, SB05-084, HB06-1313, SB07-122
Prepared By
Leonard Rice Engineering
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
13
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
model pre-processor, StatePP. StatePP then combines this data to create a precipitation recharge estimate <br />for the ground water model. The following information is provided by StateDGL <br />• Area by land use and soil type in each model cell (example alfalfa 100 acres soil type A, <br />alfalfa 50 acres soil type B, native vegetation 50 acres soil type B) <br />• Climate stations, and associated weights, that represent precipitation to each model cell <br />(example station 0448 weight 0.5, station 1437 weight 0.5) <br />Comments and Concerns <br />During the scoping phase, it was anticipated that StateCU may need to be updated to insure the <br />precipitation recharge estimate is consistent with other estimates of precipitation use <br />(consumption by crops or native lands, loss, storage, runoff, etc). However, using the monthly <br />soil moisture balance approach recommended under this task prevents double accounting of the <br />precipitation with other uses. Also, because the recommended approach is dependent on soil <br />type, the precipitation recharge calculation becomes a spatial exercise and is appropriate to keep <br />outside of the StateCU model. <br />A portion of the precipitation that falls outside a ground water model often contributes to an <br />aquifer. This inflow to the ground water model is expected to be calculated by the SPDSS <br />ground water model contractor as a boundary inflow. <br />References <br />Greb, B.W. December 1980. Snowfall and its Potential Management in the Semiarid Central <br />Great Plains, Prepared for the U. S. Department of Agriculture. Agricultural Reviews and <br />Manuals, ARM-W-18. <br />United States Department of Agriculture, Soil Conservation Service. March 1985. National <br />Engineering Handbook, Section 4 -Hydrology. Robert E. Rallison, National Hydraulic <br />Engineer. <br />ASCE Manuals and Reports on Engineering Practice No. 70. 1990. Evapotranspiration and <br />Irrigation Water Requirements. Edited by M.E. Jensen, R.D. Burman, and R.G. Allen. <br />Task 64.doc 13 of 13 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.