My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Search
RGDSS_Historic_CUreport_20040601
CWCB
>
Decision Support Systems
>
DayForward
>
RGDSS_Historic_CUreport_20040601
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
4/17/2013 10:08:47 AM
Creation date
5/27/2008 2:11:23 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Decision Support Systems
Title
RGDSS - Rio Grande Historic Crop Consumptive Use Analysis
Description
The documentation is for the Rio Grande Basin Historic Crop Consumptive Use Analysis, developed during the RGDSS implementation for the period 1950 through 2002. It includes 100 percent of the crop consumptive use in the basin for the period. Documentation consists of the final Historic Crop Consumptive Use Analysis Report and supporting appendices.
Decision Support - Doc Type
Modeling Dataset Documentation
Date
6/1/2004
DSS Category
Consumptive Use
DSS
Rio Grande
Basin
Rio Grande
Contract/PO #
C153863
Grant Type
Non-Reimbursable
Bill Number
HB98-1189, SB99-173
Prepared By
Leonard Rice Engineering
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
150
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
Conveyance Loss versus Main Canal Length <br />Most of the ditch company representatives provided loss percentages for the beginning of <br />the irrigation season, when losses tend to be higher due to ditch wetting, and for later in <br />the irrigation season. Based on past experience, we have associated the beginning losses <br />with the first month of diversions. Figure 1 shows the provided ditch losses in percent <br />versus the main canal length for the first month of irrigation. Figure 2 shows the <br />provided ditch losses in percent versus main canal length for subsequent months. <br />An attempted relationship between percent loss and main canal length resulted in low <br />correlation coefficients values (r~) for both time periods, however the trend shows that <br />losses increase with increased canal length. As expected, the average loss per mile is <br />greater during the first month of irrigation - 1.82 versus 1.21. <br />Figure 1 <br />Percent Loss versus Canal Length <br />First Month of Irrigation <br />~o <br />60 <br />~ 50 <br />a <br />O <br />J <br />0 40 <br />LL <br />w <br />O <br />~ 30 <br />N <br />v <br />L <br />a zo <br />10 <br />Canal Length (miles) <br />appendB_cropcu_6-2004.doc B-5 of B-19 12/13/00 <br />0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.