My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Search
RGDSS_Historic_CUreport_20040601
CWCB
>
Decision Support Systems
>
DayForward
>
RGDSS_Historic_CUreport_20040601
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
4/17/2013 10:08:47 AM
Creation date
5/27/2008 2:11:23 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Decision Support Systems
Title
RGDSS - Rio Grande Historic Crop Consumptive Use Analysis
Description
The documentation is for the Rio Grande Basin Historic Crop Consumptive Use Analysis, developed during the RGDSS implementation for the period 1950 through 2002. It includes 100 percent of the crop consumptive use in the basin for the period. Documentation consists of the final Historic Crop Consumptive Use Analysis Report and supporting appendices.
Decision Support - Doc Type
Modeling Dataset Documentation
Date
6/1/2004
DSS Category
Consumptive Use
DSS
Rio Grande
Basin
Rio Grande
Contract/PO #
C153863
Grant Type
Non-Reimbursable
Bill Number
HB98-1189, SB99-173
Prepared By
Leonard Rice Engineering
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
150
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
4.3 StateCU Structure File (rg2004.str) <br />A structure file provides the list of structures to be use in the analysis. The structure file <br />contains physical information and structure-specific information that does not vary over <br />time including location information; available soil capacity; and assignments of climate <br />stations to use in the analysis. Location information includes the latitude, county, and <br />HUC for each structure. The latitude is used in the Blaney-Griddle method to determine <br />the hours of daylight during the growing season. <br />The structure file used in the historic consumptive use analysis was created using <br />StateDMI to extract diversion structure location information, soil capacity information, <br />and climate weight assignments stored in HydroBase based on a list of structures to be <br />used in the analysis. The Surface Water Contractor was responsible for classifying <br />structures as key, aggregated, and ground water only. As presented in Table 3, 87 percent <br />of the acreage was assigned to key structures. The approach and results are outlined in the <br />memoranda prepared by the Surface Water Contractor for Task 6.2 Key Structure <br />Determination, Task 7.1 A~~re~ated Water Rights/Irrigated Lands Not Explicitly <br />Modeled, and Task 8.1 Review Well and Lands Served by Ground Water Only. <br />Table 3 <br />Historic Consum tive Use Structure Scenario <br /> <br />Structure Type <br />Acres Number of <br />Structures Percent of <br />Total Acreage <br />Key Diversion Structures 541,151 363 87% <br />A re ated Diversion Structures 23,721 44 4% <br />Ground Water Only Structures 57,996 62 9% <br />Total Structures 622,868 469 100% <br />In general, the following criteria were used in determining whether structures would be <br />modeled explicitly or in an aggregated fashion: <br />Key Diversion Structures: Ditch systems, totaling 541,151 acres, with relatively <br />large diversions, senior water rights, or important in administration of the Rio <br />Grande were defined as key. In addition, most structures represented in previous <br />models were defined as key. <br />A~~re~ated Diversion Structures: Ditch systems, totaling 23,721 acres, not <br />defined as key diversion structures were grouped together into aggregated <br />diversion structures. For structures without mapped service areas located outside <br />the valley floor, acreage was estimated using information reported by water <br />commissioners. For structures without mapped service areas located inside the <br />valley floor acreage was not estimated. This is because the irrigated acreage <br />assessment is believed to be complete for the valley floor and structures without <br />mapped service areas are estimated to have their acreage included with acreage <br />from other ditches. <br />cureport_6-2004.doc 18 of 48 June, 2004 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.