<br />,~ ',5 Story #2
<br />Olllil~;)
<br />
<br />~
<br />
<br />Page 1 of2
<br />
<br />Curry to take local issues to the state
<br />
<br />"It's a whole dUJerefll political scene ill Deliver flOW"
<br />bv Kristina Johnson
<br />The Gunnison Basin's power to fight transmountain water diversion has ratcheted up as Kathleen Curry-
<br />a Doyleville resident who was recently elected to the Colorado House of Representatives-prepares to
<br />head up the powerful House commitlee on Agriculture, Livestock and Naturai Resources,
<br />Just a few weeks after being elected to the state House, Curry was informed that she'd been appointed to
<br />chair the agriculture committee, which handles many of the state's water bills,
<br />On Monday, November 22, after learning of her appointment, Curry attended a meeting of the Upper
<br />Gunnison River Water Conservancy District (UGRWCD) to discuss upcoming water legislation, Prior to
<br />running for state house, Curry served as the manager of the UGRWCD, a publicly funded entity that
<br />administers local water rights and has worked to protect Gunnison Basin water from Front Range
<br />diversion attempts,
<br />Curry returned to face the UGRWCD board on November 22 in a new roie-one that carries the potential
<br />to shape water policy for the slate as it reaches a critical crossroads.
<br />At that meeting, Curry asked board members for their direction and support in spearheading efforts to
<br />protect local water interests.
<br />As a freshman member of the House, Curry said she is expected to submit her first three bills by
<br />December 15, though she wiil not be officiaily sworn in unlil January 12,
<br />One piece of legislation Curry will likely deal with in her first term wiil be a funding request to extend the
<br />Statewide Water Supply Initiative (SWSI), a study that has ruffied the feathers of UGRWCD board
<br />members, who complain that they've been excluded from the SWSI process and say the resulting report
<br />could encourage attempts at transmountain water diversion.
<br />The SWSI study was commissioned by the Colorado legisiature in 2002 at a cost of nearly $3 miilion to
<br />explore, in each of Colorado's basins, existing water supplies along with existing and projected demands
<br />for water through the year 2030-and potential options for meeting those demands, The legislature will
<br />likely be the institution that makes decisions to fund, or not to fund, particular projects,
<br />On November 16, after an 18-month process, the Colorado Water Conservation Board (CWCB)-the state
<br />agency charged with overseeing SWSI, approved the report and sent It on to the state legislature, At that
<br />time UGRWCD representatives voiced their concern that they had been left out of the SWSI process,
<br />something Curry also acknowledged at the November 22 UGRWCD meeting,
<br />"The SWSI dialogue wasn't at the level it should have been," explains Karen Shirley, current manager of
<br />the UGRWCD, "It wasn't as open as it should have been for a state tax-funded project:
<br />One particular concern, according to Shirley, is that the current SWSI report couid set the stage for a
<br />single solution to Colorado's water supply problems-and that solution could spelltransmountain
<br />diversion.
<br />" The state is putting a lot of pressure on west slope communilies to come to the table and talk about
<br />transmountain diversion projects," Shirley explains.
<br />At the UGRWCD board meeling on November 22, Curry emphasized the need to discuss alternatives to
<br />transmountain diversion, which include water conservation efforts and better use of existing water in the
<br />basins experienCing shortages.
<br />"We need to make sure there's equal attention paid to solutions besides out-of-basin diversions," Curry
<br />told board members on November 22, "I want money and time spent on other ways to deal with water-
<br />suppiy shortages,"
<br />Now the CWCS is expected to ask the state legislature for an additional $2S0,OOO to continue work on Ihe
<br />Statewide Water Supply Initiative, Curry told the UGRWCD board that she plans to keep a watchful eye on
<br />how CWCS spends that money,
<br />.. On SWSI, the legislature was not very engaged in the expenditure of $2,8 million," she told board
<br />members, As the chair of the agriculture committee, she explained, she will likeiy be expected to sponsor
<br />the construction bill embedded with the CWCS funding request
<br />" Since I'm supposed to be the one who carries that bill, I think I can ask some questions," she said, ''I'm
<br />going to want to communicate directly with the CWCB staff about it," she added after the meeting, "I want
<br />to have an idea of what the money will be used for this time,"
<br />Curry also asked the UGRWCD board members for direction on legislation that would compensate the
<br />Gunnison Basin in the event of a trans mountain diversion project.
<br />This type of legislation, known as Basin of Origin Protection, would require an entity diverting water to pay
<br />fees or build water storage projects in the basin where the water originates. Different versions of Basin of
<br />Origin Protection have come before the Colorado legislature in the past, but all have died,
<br />Basin of Origin bills have sparked debate among members of the UGRWCD board, Some argue that such
<br />legislation is needed to prepare for a worst-case scenario. Others fear that agreeing to Basin of Origin
<br />
<br />http://\Vww.crestedbuttenews,com/new s2, h tm I
<br />
<br />11/29/2004
<br />
|