Laserfiche WebLink
<br />'/ <br /> <br />000404 <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />, <br />I . ' ,. <br />_. III./'-" <br />(?!/ <br /> <br />(Y <br /> <br />THE AGREEMENT IN PRINCIPLE <br />The Fulfillment Of A National Obligation <br /> <br />The Agreement in Principle, negotiated and agreed to the Ute <br />Mountain Ute and Southern Ute Indian Tribes, the State of <br />Colorado and a large number of Colorado and New Mexico water <br />entities culminates what can fairly be characterized as a one <br />hundred year national commitment to protect and preserve both the <br />Ute Indian homelands in the Upper Colorado Basin and the <br />resources of the Colorado River. <br /> <br />The national commitment to the Ute Indians emerges from a <br />series of federal laws -- the Treaty of October 7, 1863, the <br />Treaty of March 2, 1868 and the Act of February 20, 1895. Each <br />of these Congressional enactments was designed to protect and <br />preserve a portion of the lands and waters of the Upper Colorado <br />River basin for a permanent homeland for the Ute Indian people. <br />This one hundred year national commitment to provide a permanent <br />homeland to the Ute Indians containing ample water resources has <br />been mirrored by a more recent national commitment to the Tribes <br />and to the non-Indian citizens of Colorado and New Mexico to <br />protect the Upper Basin share of Colorado River water. <br /> <br />The principal water resource project which is targeted in <br />the Agreement in Principle -- the Animas La Plata Project -- was <br />specifically identified by Congress in 1968 as a subject of <br />special attention and the object of a special national <br />Obligation. In enacting the Colorado River Basin Project Act of <br />1968, 43 U.S.C. 9 6l(a)(1), Congress directed the Secretary of <br />the Interior to "proceed as nearly as practicable with the <br />construction of the Animas-La Plata .... project concurrently <br />with the Central Arizona Project, to the end that such project(s) <br />shall be completed not later than the date of the first delivery <br />of water from the Central Arizona Project." The 1968 legislation <br />was specifically designed to implement the allocation of water <br />between the Upper Basin and Lower Basin states which was <br />negotiated in the 1922 Colorado River Compact. See Arizona v. <br />California, 373 U.S. 546, 553 (1963). <br /> <br />The 1968 mandate of Congress carried forth what has become a <br />significant national commitment to harness the waters of the <br />Colorado River for the benefit of all Western citizens. The <br />United States Supreme Court made the following observations in <br />the 1963 decision in Arizona v. California. <br /> <br />The prospect that the United States would undertake to build <br />as a national project the necessary works to control floods <br />and store river water for irrigation was apparently a <br />welcome one for the basin States. But it brought to life <br />strong fears in the northern basin States that additional <br />waters made available by the storage and canal projects <br />might be gobbled up in perpetuity by faster growing lower <br />