My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
BOARD02037
CWCB
>
Board Meetings
>
Backfile
>
2001-3000
>
BOARD02037
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/16/2009 3:10:23 PM
Creation date
10/4/2006 7:08:29 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Board Meetings
Board Meeting Date
9/22/2003
Description
Report of the Attorney General
Board Meetings - Doc Type
Memo
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
5
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />>' <br /> <br />. <br /> <br /> <br />" <br /> <br />KEN SALAZAR <br />Attorney General <br /> <br />DONALD S. QUICK <br />Chief Deputy Attorney General <br /> <br />ALAN J. GILBERT <br />Solicitor General <br /> <br />STATE OF COLORADO <br />DEPARTMENT OF LAW <br /> <br />STATE SERVICES BUILDING <br />1525 Sherman Street - 5th Floor <br />Denverf Colorado 80203 <br />Phone 303) 866-4500 <br />FAX 303) 866-5691 <br /> <br />OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL <br /> <br />September 15, 2003 <br /> <br />MEMORANDUM <br /> <br />TO: <br /> <br />Colorado Water Conservation Board <br /> <br />FROM: <br /> <br />Ken Salazar <br />Attorney General <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />RE: <br /> <br />Felicity Hannay <br />Deputy Attorney General <br /> <br />Report of the Attorney Generall <br /> <br />1. Forest Service Reserved Rights Cases, Case Nos, 81-CW-220 et aI" Water Division 2. <br /> <br />Wendy Weiss on behalf of the state parties signed the stipulation allowing the Forest Service <br />to withdraw the Division 2 claims with prejudice. Only two other objectors have yet to sign <br />similar stipulations, because of what we believe are only procedural delays. Dismissal should <br />still be imminent. <br /> <br />2. Forest Service Reserved Rights Cases, Case Nos. W-1146-73 et aI" Water Division 7. <br /> <br />In June, the state and water users responded jointly in writing to the Forest Service's <br />settlement proposal. Our response set forth some general principles to guide future negotiations <br />that we would require in order to continue on a settlement path. The United States is apparently <br />still considering our response. Trout Unlimited has renewed their request to be made a party to <br />the settlement discussions. As the Board may recall, TU intervened in these cases in early 2000. <br />In fall of2000 they requested - and the U.S. and the other objectors refused - that they be given <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />I Text concerning previously reported matters will usually contain only information on recent developments rather <br />than repeating background information. Material to which we wish to call special attention appears in bold italics, <br />and any entirely new matters are specifically identified as [NEW]. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.