My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
BOARD01978
CWCB
>
Board Meetings
>
Backfile
>
2001-3000
>
BOARD01978
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/16/2009 3:09:32 PM
Creation date
10/4/2006 7:06:03 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Board Meetings
Board Meeting Date
3/29/1999
Description
Colorado River Basin Issues - Animas-La Plata Project - Status Report
Board Meetings - Doc Type
Memo
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
2
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />Agenda Item L11 <br /> <br />STATE OF COLOMbO <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />EXECUTIVE CHAMBERS <br /> <br />136 State Capitol <br />Denver, Colorado 80203.179~ <br />Phone (30Jl 866.2~71 <br /> <br />.or'CO~o' <br />,'i?;!1';:'ii;h <br />i!~::'-YiFX...._.b~ <br />""!r~- c~ <br />~.,~r::c.'_'" <br />~''l-~':_'''../ <br />'"'/a7';" <br /> <br />Sill Qwens <br />Go~'ernor <br /> <br />March 9, 1999 <br /> <br />'- ' <br /> <br />" <br />~ <br /> <br />.......... <br />The Honorable Bruce Babbitt <br />Secretary of the Interior <br />1849 C StreetN.W. <br />Washington, D.C. 20240 <br /> <br />Dear Bruce: <br /> <br />You and I have not had a chance personally to discuss the Animas-La Plata water <br />Project in Southwest Colorado, but the recent public scoping meetings in Colorado <br />attracted a great deal of attention, and I want to make clear my Administration's <br />position on A-LP. <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />First and foremost, Colorado will continue to support construction of the project as soon <br />as possible as provided by the Indian Water Rights Settlement Act. Colorado believes <br />A-LP is the only reasonable solution to the 130 year-old Tribal water rights issue, and I <br />believe fairness to the Tribes and the local water users requires it. We intend to hold the <br />federal government to' commitments that have been made, and will expect action soon. <br /> <br />Second, we are skeptical about several aspects of your proposal oflast August, <br />commonly called "A-LP Ultra Light." In particular, providing the Tribes some of the <br />water to which they are entitled while providing no irrigation component or non-Indian <br />water is half a solution at best. It drives a wedge between local water users and Tribes, <br />which can only further the difficulty of getting the project built and avoiding more <br />costly litigation. Moreover, the small size of the reservoir you proposed clearly does not <br />solve the problem, and may actually create a worse environmental problem, as I think <br />you are aware. <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />Finally, you need to know that under no circumstances is Colorado prepared to support <br />de-authorization of its entitled and authorized water projects as part of the A-LP <br />agreement. These projects were authorized as part of the deal between Upper and Lower <br />Basins that resulted in the Central Arizona Project and Colorado will not surrender its <br />half of the bargain for noriing. As you well know, California and Nevada are facing <br />extreme difficulty supplying the water they need, the 4.4. Plan is not progressing well, <br />the effort to quantify senior water rights in the Lower Basin remains illusive, and the <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.