My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
BOARD01320
CWCB
>
Board Meetings
>
Backfile
>
1001-2000
>
BOARD01320
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/16/2009 3:00:16 PM
Creation date
10/4/2006 6:53:17 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Board Meetings
Board Meeting Date
9/13/2004
Description
ISF Section - Case No. 1-04CW121, City and County of Denver
Board Meetings - Doc Type
Memo
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
2
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />. <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />Consent Agenda Item la <br />Case No. I-04CWI21; City and County of Denver <br /> <br />Application Summary <br /> <br />This is an application for quantifying reusable portion ofnon-sewered return flows (lawn <br />irrigation, car washing, etc.) applicable to Applicant's service area and for obtaining approval to <br />use those return flows for augmentation, substitution and exchange and for direct diversion and <br />storage. Applicant proposes to use return flows in plans for augmentation, for substitution and <br />exchange and divert from stream and use directly or store for later use to meet treated water and <br />non-potable demands within Applicant's service area. <br /> <br />CWCB Appropriations <br /> <br />The Board holds the following instream flow water rights that may be injured by this application: <br /> <br />CWCB Case StreamlLake Amount Approp. Watershed County <br />No, (cfs) Date <br />1-93CWIOO Little Dry Creek 2.2 7/22/93 South Platte River Arapahoe <br /> <br />Potential for Iniurv <br /> <br />Applicant's use oflawn irrigation return flows historically accruing to Little Dry Creek may injure <br />the CWCB's ISF water right on this creek, <br /> <br />Other Objectors <br /> <br />The other objectors in this case are: Arapahoe County Water and Wastewater Authority, Bear <br />Creek Development Corporation, Bijou Irrigation Company and Bijou Irrigation District, <br />Centennial Water and Sanitation District, Central Colorado Water Conservancy District, City and <br />County of Broomfield, the cities of Aurora, Brighton, Commerce City, Englewood, Greeley, <br />Lakewood, Louisville, Thornton, and Westminster, Consolidated Ditches of Water District No.2, <br />Coors Brewing Company, East Cherry Creek Valley Water and Sanitation District" Fainnount <br />Cemetery Company, Fanners Highline Canal and Reservoir Company, Fulton Irrigation Ditch <br />Company, Glenmoor Country Club, Henrylyn Irrigation District, New Brantner Extension Ditch <br />Company, Parker Water and Sanitation District, Platte Valley Irrigation Company, Public Service <br />Company of Colorado, South Adams County Water and Sanitation District, South Suburban Park <br />and Recreation District, the Denver Country Club, the State Engineer and Division Engineer for <br />Water Division I, and the Upper Cherry Creek Water Association. <br /> <br />L:\Section Folders\SECC\Case Files\2004\1-04CW121_mem.doc <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.