Laserfiche WebLink
<br />e <br /> <br />e <br /> <br />e <br /> <br />STATE OF COLORADO <br /> <br />Colorado Water Conservation Board <br />Department of Natural Resources <br />1313 Sherman S_, Room 721 <br />Denver, Colorado 80203 <br />Phone: (303) 866-3441 <br />FAX: (303)866-4474 <br />www.cwcb.state.co.us <br /> <br /> <br />MEMORANDUM <br /> <br />Bill Owens <br />Governor <br /> <br />RussellG<orge <br />Executive Director <br /> <br />TO: <br /> <br />Colorado Water Conservation Board Members <br /> <br />Rod Kuharich <br />CWCBDirector <br /> <br />FROM: <br /> <br />Jeff Baessler <br /> <br />Rick Brown <br />Acting Deputy Director <br /> <br />DATE: <br /> <br />September 12, 2005 <br /> <br />SUBJECT: Agenda Item 17, September 13-14, 2005 Board Meeting <br />Funding limitations on USGS Streamgaging Programs in Colorado <br /> <br />Background <br /> <br />In Colorado, the United States Geological Survey (USGS) currently operates <br />approximately 251 stream flow gages as part of its Cooperative Water Program (CWP). <br />This program utilizes cost-sharing partnerships between the USGS and water-resource <br />agencies at state and local levels as well as other entities. An additional 34 gages are <br />operated under the National Stream flow Information Program (NSIP). This program <br />provides full federal funding for the continued operation and maintenance of critical <br />gages, such as those used for compact administration. <br /> <br />In recent years, the USGS has received reduced or near level federal funding for both <br />stream gaging programs in Colorado and nationwide. At the same time, mandatory <br />federal salary increases and other inflationary costs have steadily increased, resulting in <br />a net funding loss. This has translated directly into the loss of valuable gages as well as <br />increased costs to cost-share cooperators. <br /> <br />In Colorado, this reduction in funding has created a real potential for the loss of up to 20 <br />gages during fiscal year 2006. The period of record for each of these individual gages <br />varies, but the average period of record for all of these gages is approximately 18 years. <br />This represents a significant loss in data that could be used for modeling within the <br />state's DSS systems. In addition, staff has estimated that 40% of these gages can <br />currently be accessed to help with monitoring and administration of the Board's ISF <br />rights. A continued reduction in federal funding combined with budgetary constraints on <br />state and local funding partners will result in a continual decline in the number of active <br />CWP gages in Colorado. <br /> <br />Flood Protection. Water Supply Planning And Finane:< . Stream And Lake Protection <br />Water Supply Protection. Conservation and Drought Planning <br />