Laserfiche WebLink
• <br /> AIs ' #) PO Box 680 <br /> 'We "' :'; Monument, CO 80132 <br /> r <br /> (719) 488-9117 <br /> http://www.appliedweatherassociates.com <br /> ,. awaadmin @comcast.net <br /> September 13, 2013 <br /> Proposal to Review the Extreme Precipitation Analysis Tool <br /> (EPAT), Phase II: Independent Meteorological Review <br /> Response to Solicitation DQ#: PEA-1402 <br /> Overview <br /> The development of an extreme precipitation analysis tool using geographic information system <br /> (GIS)technology is a valid and desirable undertaking. Such a tool can potentially provide <br /> objective analysis results for use in determining extreme rainfall values for individual drainage <br /> basins. The Dam Safety Branch(DSB) of the Colorado State Engineer's Office (SEO) is to be <br /> commended for taking the initiative in 2005 to develop a GIS based tool, subsequently named <br /> the Extreme Precipitation Analysis Tool (EPAT). The intent of this initiative was to objectively <br /> determine extreme rainfall values using procedures applied in the NOAA Hydrometeorological <br /> Reports (HMRs). These procedures have been refined and used in site-specific Probable <br /> Maximum Precipitation(PMP) studies for individual drainage basins. EPAT was developed to <br /> automate the site-specific PMP (SSPMP)methodology. <br /> The DSB has statutory responsibility to set reservoir storage levels and to review and approve <br /> design and construction for dams throughout the state. Design rainfall values from the HMRs <br /> and from SSPMP studies have historically been used for computing the inflow design flood <br /> (IDF). It is imperative that dam spillways are adequate to convey the IDF without causing dam <br /> failure. Hence it is critically important that the design rainfall values be objectively determined <br /> using reliable and reproducible procedures. For a GIS based tool to be used in the determination <br /> of the design rainfall values, it must apply SSPMP determination procedures in an objective, <br /> meteorologically accurate, reliable and reproducible manner. The tool must produce extreme <br /> rainfall values that are consistent with historically observed extreme rainfall events while <br /> calculating extreme rainfall values that can be produced by storms that are physically possible <br /> for a given watershed location. Being"physically possible" is required by the definition of PMP <br /> in the HMRs (e.g. HMR 59). This constraint is also applied to SSPMP studies and hence must <br /> be a constraint incorporated in any GIS tool used to evaluate PMP values. Results produced by <br /> the GIS based tool must be physically possible based on combinations of storm characteristics <br /> that produce the most extreme rainfall values possible while insuring that unrealistic assumptions <br /> or inconsistent combinations of parameters are not allowed. The purpose of the tool is not to <br /> produce the largest rainfall values that can be mathematically calculated but to produce the <br /> largest rainfall values that can be produced by physically possible combinations of storm <br /> characteristics considering the location,meteorology and topography of a drainage basin. <br />