Laserfiche WebLink
M <br />Opinions of the Colorado Supreme Court are available to the <br />public and can be accessed through the Court's homepage at <br />http: / /www.courts.state.co.us and are posted on the Colorado <br />Bar Association's homepage at www.cobar.org. <br />ADVANCE SHEET HEADNOTE <br />April 20, 2009 <br />No. 07SA293, Vance v. Wolfe -- the Water Right Determination and <br />Administration Act of 1969 -- the Colorado Ground Water <br />Management Act -- beneficial use -- well -- appropriation. <br />This is an appeal from a declaratory judgment action <br />brought in District Court, Water Division 7 by William S. Vance, <br />Jr., Elizabeth S. Vance, James G. Fitzgerald, and Mary Theresa <br />Fitzgerald. They asked the water court to determine the legal <br />obligations of the State Engineer and Division Engineer for Water <br />Division 7 regarding well permits and augmentation plans when <br />ground water is diverted for the purpose of coalbed methane <br />production. <br />The Engineers and BP America Production Company, an <br />intervenor in the action, opposed the request for a declaratory <br />judgment, arguing that the use of water during coalbed methane <br />production is not a "beneficial use" and thus need not be <br />regulated. The water court held that coalbed methane production <br />constitutes an appropriation for a "beneficial use," and that <br />consequently, the Engineers cannot allow out -of- priority <br />diversions without a well permit and, where necessary, a decree <br />adjudicating an augmentation plan. This direct appeal followed. <br />