My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Rec Water Flows Not Fun for State (2)
CWCB
>
Water Supply Protection
>
DayForward
>
3001-4000
>
Rec Water Flows Not Fun for State (2)
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/23/2010 3:37:40 PM
Creation date
6/22/2010 9:02:37 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Water Supply Protection
Description
RICD News Articles
State
CO
Basin
Arkansas
Water Division
2
Date
9/17/2005
Author
Chris Woodka, The Pueblo Chieftain
Title
Rec Water Flows Not Fun for State
Water Supply Pro - Doc Type
News Article/Press Release
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
2
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
Kowalski, Ted <br />Prom: Miller, Steve <br />Sent: Monday, September 19, 2005 11:44 AM <br />To: Kuharich, Rod; Kowalski, Ted; Seaholm, Randy; Merriman, Dan; Brown, Rick <br />Subject: Rec water flows not fun for state <br />I feel your pain. <br />Steve Miller <br />Water Supply Protection and Planning Specialist <br />Colorado Water Conservation Board <br />1313 Sherman Street, Room 721 <br />Denver, CO 80203 <br />email: steve.miller(a - )-state.co.us <br />303 - 866 -3532 <br />[fax 303 - 866 -4474] <br />[cell 303 - 829 -1650] <br />The Pueblo Chieftain Online <br />Published: Saturday September 17, 2005 <br />Rec water flows not fun for state <br />By CHRIS WOODKA <br />THE PUEBLO CHIEFTAIN <br />The Colorado Water Conservation Board continues to grapple with making rules to deal with a new kind of <br />water right for recreation, the state's chief of natural resources said Thursday. <br />Russ George, executive director of the Colorado Department of Natural Resources, spoke about recreational in- <br />channel diversions Thursday at the meeting of the Southeastern Colorado Water Conservancy District. <br />Earlier this week, the CWCB held a hearing on rules, but won't reach a decision until later this year or early <br />next year, depending on the shape of new legislation regarding the rules. An attempt to clarify RICDs failed in <br />the Legislature earlier this year. <br />"On Monday, the CWCB slogged through RICD rules," George said. "This is one of the thorniest, toughest, <br />most unmanageable legal issues we've ever had to deal with." <br />Recreational water rights first were explored by Fort Collins in the early 1990s, George said. Now, there are <br />more cases throughout the state. <br />Earlier this year the Supreme Court struck down an RICD on the Gunnison River and said the CWCB was to <br />rule on applications before them, rather than adjusting the specific numbers of those applications. The CWCB <br />acts as a referee through RICD hearings, and then must become an objector in water court on RICD <br />applications. <br />Two RICD cases are pending in Southern Colorado. Pueblo is seeking an RICD for its Downtown kayak course, <br />and Chaffee County is attempting to gain an RICD on two reaches of the Arkansas River at Buena Vista and <br />Salida. <br />RICD requirements are not clearly defined, George said, creating problems for other water users trying to fit <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.