Laserfiche WebLink
- - - - - - - = " �TEI EMBER - _23,1005 <br />By Jerd Spa <br />ROCKY MOUNTAIN NEWS <br />A high- country water district and <br />the state of Colorado have settled <br />their differences over a controver- <br />sial white -water kayaking course on <br />the Gunnison River. <br />The settlement guarantees <br />enough frothy water to satisfy kay- <br />akers while protecting others who <br />use Gunnison Riverwater. <br />"We're very pleased," said Cynthia <br />Covell, the attorney representing <br />the Upper Gunnison River Water <br />Conservancy District. "This is defi- <br />nitely a victory for recreational wa- <br />ter users." <br />The case, the subject of a Colo- <br />rado Supreme Court ruling last <br />March, has garnered widespread at- <br />tention in Colorado because the <br />Gunnison River course was one of <br />the first created under a ground- <br />breaking 2001 law authorizing local <br />governments to claim recreational <br />water rights. <br />The Colorado Water Conserva- <br />tion Board, charged with managing <br />the state's streams and administer- <br />ing the 2001 law, has fought several <br />proposed white -water courses, say- <br />ing that some either claim too much <br />water in the stream, threaten the <br />" Th is is an example <br />of hove parties can <br />come together to <br />reach a reasonable <br />compromise." <br />Ted Kowalski, of the Colorado <br />Water Conservation Board's <br />recreational water program <br />state's ability to deliver water owed <br />to other states, or could hamper the <br />ability of others, such as cities and <br />farmers, to claim_ additional water <br />in the future. <br />But communities that have <br />sought to build white -water courses <br />have argued successfully that this <br />new use of water is justified and pro - <br />vides a secondary environmental <br />benefit to the stream. <br />In the Upper Gunnison case, the <br />water district agreed to reduce the <br />maximum amount of water it want- <br />ed between May and September to <br />1,200 cubic feet per second per <br />down from its original request of <br />1,500 cfs. <br />The Colorado Water Conserva= <br />tion Board originally had tried to <br />limit the course to a maximum of <br />250 cfs, according to Ted Kowalski, <br />who oversees the recreational water <br />program for the water board. <br />But Kowalski said the board was <br />satisfied with the settlement be- <br />cause the water district agreed to <br />limit its requests for recreational wa- <br />ter at certain times when stream <br />flows are low and others are trying <br />to divert water from the river. <br />"This is an example of how parties <br />can come together to reach a reason- <br />able compromise," Kowalski said. <br />Such conflicts between recrea- <br />tional and traditional water uses are <br />becoming snore common through- <br />out the West, as population pres- <br />sures strain water supplies and com- <br />petition for what remains grows. <br />The settlement comes nine <br />months after the Colorado Supreme <br />Court ruled that the Upper Gunni- <br />son District had a legitimate right to <br />claim recreational flows in the <br />stream and to determine the <br />amount of water it needed for its <br />course. <br />But since that decision, the legal <br />wrangling has continued as several <br />other communities, including Silver - <br />thorne and Steamboat Springs, <br />sought water for their white -water <br />courses, too. <br />