Laserfiche WebLink
l~ga Vs~Ws <br />Streamflow Needs of Rare and Endangered Fishes: <br />Yampa River Interim Flow Recommendations <br />FINAE REPORT <br />by <br />U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, Region 6 <br />Denver, Colorado 80225 <br />March 5, 1990 <br />Introduction <br />The Green River basin is the last remaining stronghold of the Colorado <br />squawfish (Ptychocheilus Lucius) and the razorback sucker (Xyrauchen texanus) <br />in native riverine environments. It also supports populations of the humpback <br />chub (Gila c ha) and is a recommended recovery area for the bonytail chub <br />(Gila elegans). Flows of the Yampa River, last free-flowing river containing <br />endangered fish habitat in the Upper Colorado River Basin, are considered <br />critical to the maintenance of usable fish habitat of rare and endangered <br />fishes (Figure 1) in the Green River basin (reviewed by Tyus and Karp 1989). <br />Typical flows in the Yampa River begin to rise from winter basefiows in late <br />March and continue to rise through May. The annual peak at Deerlodge Park <br />usually occurs during the end of May and continues into the first week of June. <br />Peak flows at Deerlodge Park typically range from 7,748 to 20,476 cfs (75-25Ro <br />exceedence values}, and the lowest peak flow recorded was 3,821 cfs, and the <br />highest was 33,200 cfs (1977 and 1984, respectively}. In early to mid-June <br />flows begin a steady decline through August, subside to base flows in September <br />and continue at baseflow through the remainder of the year. The lowest base <br />flow recorded at Deerlodge Park was 43 cfs on September 5 and 6, 1988. <br />The Recovery Implementation Program (RIP), a cooperative effort between Federal <br />and State governments, water and power users, and conservationists (U.S. Fish <br />and Wildlife Service 1987), outlined procedures to protect four rare and <br />endangered fishes in the Upper Colorado River Basin. One of these is the <br />provision and maintenance of instream flows at certain times, locations, and <br />quantities, as necessary. The Yampa River was subsequently identified by the <br />cooperators as the highest priority area for investigating opportunities to <br />acquire instream water rights for the endangered fishes. A three-step process <br />was recommended to quantify the flow need of the fish in the Yampa River: <br />(1) an evaluation of habitat use, potential limiting factors, and general flaw <br />needs relative to the maintenance and recovery of the endangered fishes and <br />supporting aquatic habitat; (2) quantification based on the best available <br />information and knowledge of the identified flow needs with respect to the <br />quantity, duration, and timing of flows; and (3) identification of future <br />studies necessary to refine or corroborate existing flow recommendations <br />developed in Step 2 above. Step I has been accomplished with a 1989 <br />publication "Habitat use and Streamflow needs of rare and endangered fishes, <br />Yampa River, Colorado" (Tyus and Karp 1989). This report provides Step 2 by <br />providing interim flow recommendations which are based on our best available <br />data and understanding of the Yampa River system and the needs of the fishes in <br />question. <br />7~~~ <br />