~~~
<br />Copeia, 1986(4), pp. 1021-1029
<br />© 1986 by the American Society of~
<br />Ichthyologists and Herpetologists
<br />.t
<br />
<br />RECENT CAPTURE OF A BONYTAIL (GILA
<br />ELEGANS) AND OBSERVATIONS ON THIS
<br />NEARLY EXTINCT CYPRINID FROM THE
<br />COLORADO RIVER.-The bonytail (Gila ele-
<br />gans) is one of several Gila endemic to the Col-
<br />orado River basin. The aquatic ecosystems of
<br />the basin have been profoundly altered by water-
<br />development projects, introduction of non-na-
<br />tive fishes, poor land-use practices and other
<br />activities of technologic man (Miller, 1961;
<br />Minckley and Deacon, 1968; Ono et al., 1983).
<br />The negative effects of these changes have pre-
<br />sumably been especially significant for the
<br />bonytail, for it is now near extinction.
<br />Observations of early workers indicate bony-
<br />tail were formerly widespread and abundant in
<br />the large rivers (Jordan, 1891; Jordan and Ev-
<br />ermann, 1896; Gilbert and Scofield, 1898).
<br />Vanicek and Kramer (1969) collected 67 bony-
<br />tail (> 200 mm TL) from the Green River dur-
<br />ing 1964-66 and were the last to report appre-
<br />ciable numbers in riverine habitat. During the
<br />past several years, fewer than ten presumed
<br />bonytail have been captured from the Green
<br />(Tyus et al., 1982 and references therein; Paul
<br />B. Holden, pers. com.) and about 25 bonytail
<br />have been collected from Lake Mohave, a lower
<br />Colorado River reservoir in which the few
<br />bonytail are large, old and apparently not re-
<br />producing (Minckley, 1983; Bozek et al., 1984).
<br />Because morphological characters do not clear-
<br />ly distinguish young bonytail from other sym-
<br />patric Gila, reproductive success of Green River
<br />bonytail is unknown. We document here the
<br />recent capture of a bonytail, describe the cap-
<br />ture site and other species that occur there and
<br />offer additional observations on the bonytail of
<br />the Colorado River basin.
<br />We captured a bonytail on July 17, 1984, from
<br />the Black Rocks area of the Colorado River,
<br />western Colorado. This 2 km long reach, a ma-
<br />jor habitat for humpback chub (G. cypha), is a
<br />narrow, deep-water, turbulent area formed by
<br />passage of the river through a relatively ero-
<br />sion-resistant layer of metamorphic rock. The
<br />Black Rocks area is unlike the broad, relatively
<br />shallow reaches of the nearby Gunnison and
<br />Green rivers from which bonytail historically
<br />were collected Qordan, 1891; Jordan and Ev-
<br />
<br />o
<br />ermann, 1896). We photographed the fish (Fig.
<br />1), a mature female with light tubercles on pec-
<br />toral fins and head and took the following mea-
<br />surementsand counts (after Lagler et al., 1977)
<br />before releasing it alive: total length, 458 mm;
<br />fork length, 418 mm; weight, 560 g; distance
<br />between insertion of pectoral and pelvic fins,
<br />86.6 mm; depth of nucha] depression (Smith
<br />et al., 1979), 6.7 mm; caudal-peduncle depth,
<br />14.8 mm; caudal-peduncle length, 108.9 mm;
<br />head length, 85.8 mm; dorsal-fin base, 53.2 mm;
<br />anal-fin base, 55.2 mm; dorsal-fin rays, 10; and
<br />anal-fin rays, 10.
<br />These data and the photograph were provid-
<br />ed to six ichthyologists who have worked ex-
<br />tensively on the taxonomy of Gila and each was
<br />asked his opinion as to the identity of the fish.
<br />Four of five respondents agreed that the fish
<br />was a bonytail. The fifth believed the fish was
<br />largely bonytail, but that the ventral mouth
<br />overhung by the snout indicated the presence
<br />of some humpback chub genes. Two respon-
<br />dents mentioned the "Roman nose" or "flat
<br />head"-characters that could be interpreted as
<br />indicative of the occurrence of humpback chub
<br />genes-but the presence of these characters did
<br />not affect their identifications. One of these re-
<br />spondents suggested such characters reflect in-
<br />dividual variation that is especially pronounced
<br />among old fish.
<br />The bonytail was large and probably old. The
<br />largest seen by Vanicek and Kramer (1969) was
<br />388 mm TL (estimated on the basis of scale
<br />annuli to be 7 yr old). Seven bonytail collected
<br />by Bozek et al. (1984) from Lake Mohave were
<br />475-535 mm TL. The largest bonytail seen by
<br />Minckley (1973), from another lower Colorado
<br />River reservoir (Lake Havasu), was 489 mm TL.
<br />Although the age of that fish was not given,
<br />marks on otoliths of large bonytail from Lake
<br />Mohave suggested these fish might be more than
<br />30 yr old (W. L. Minckley, pers. com.).
<br />Our capture demonstrates that bonytail re-
<br />main in the upper Colorado River basin, al-
<br />though their scarcity suggests a viable popula-
<br />tion might not exist. In addition to the bonytail,
<br />we collected 602 adult-size (>250 mm TL) Gila
<br />from the Black Rocks area; on the basis of gross
<br />morphologic characters, we tentatively identi-
<br />fied 272 as humpback chub, 271 as roundtail
<br />chub (G. robusta) and 59 as possible intergrades
<br />
|