Laserfiche WebLink
<br />. <br /> <br />, , <br /> <br /> <br />... ~ y r\l5 \,\- C; <br />h&~ <br /> <br />QC( Z-o( <br /> <br />-- <br /> <br />Controversy in the Mid '60's <br /> <br />Unsolved Questions <br /> <br />News commentary on the most recent f'River ','far" has been <br /> <br />included in the next section of the paper. These articles are <br /> <br />arranged by date to ShOiO{ progression of the case and sentiment. <br /> <br />The U.S. Supreme Court case mentioned in the articles is : <br /> <br />Arizona versus California, 373 U.s. 546,383 U.s. Supreme Court <br /> <br />Reoorter 263, June, 1963 (ammended in 1966). In this case, the <br /> <br />Court finally apportioned the m~instre~m waters of the Lower <br /> <br />Color~do Basin: California 4,400,000 acre-teet, Arizona 2,800, <br /> <br />JOO acre-feet, and Nevada 300,000 acre-feet. Note that Califor- <br /> <br />nia was forced to hold with her initial limit set by internal <br /> <br />leglsl~tion i~ 1935. <br /> <br />-15- <br />