My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Arkansas - HighLineCanal_SummarySheet
CWCB
>
Alt Ag Water Transfer Grants
>
DayForward
>
Arkansas - HighLineCanal_SummarySheet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/25/2010 1:07:01 PM
Creation date
7/22/2008 9:26:49 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Alt Ag Water Transfer Grants
Basin Roundtable
Arkansas
Applicant
High Line Canal Company
Description
Line Canal Water Leasing Project
Board Meeting Date
5/21/2008
Alt Ag Water - Doc Type
Summary Sheet - CWCB Evaluation/Approval Documents
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
2
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
Alternative Agricultural Water Transfer Methods -Grant and Loan Program <br />Project Summary Sheet <br />Applicant: High Line Canal Company <br />Water Activity Name: High Line Canal Water Leasing Project <br />Amount Requested: $750,000 <br />Matching Funds: $75,000 <br />Drainage Basin: Arkansas River <br />Water Source: Arkansas River <br />Project Summary: <br />Members of the Highline Canal Company are interesting in leasing some of their water to <br />municipalities. The application states that they seek to use a combination of three <br />methods: interruptible water supply agreements, long term land fallowing and water <br />banking. <br />Below is a summary of the scope of work: <br />Scope of Work <br />Task 1-Establish Leasing Entity <br />Task 2-Gaining Commits from Ditches <br />Task 3-Water Right Evaluations <br />Task 4-Ditch Operations Analysis <br />Task 5-Pipeline Analysis <br />Discussion: <br />While it is clear that the proposal seeks to use various alternative methods such as leasing, <br />interruptible supply agreements and/or rotational fallowing, the application is not <br />sufficiently complete for staff to evaluate and make a recommendation of funding of up to <br />$750,000. Without more detail, staff is unable to determine if it meets the eligibility <br />requirements or the evaluation criteria. Most importantly, one of the purposes of this <br />program is to not simply be aimed at facilitating a single locally-driven transfer but must <br />also provide usable and transferable information or processes that will increase our <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.