Laserfiche WebLink
CRDSS <br />TASK MEMORANDUM 1.14-18 <br />Consumptive Use Model <br />Review of U.S. Bureau of Reclamation Weather Stations <br />and Recommended New Stations <br />1.0 ISSUE <br />Climatic data from National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA) weather stations are <br />used to determine agricultural crop consumptive use in the U.S. Bureau of Reclamation's (USBR?s) <br />Colorado River System Consumptive Uses and Losses Report, 1981-1985 . It was recommended in the <br />Phase I CRDSS Task Memorandum 1.14-1 that the weather station sites be checked for <br />representativeness. This memorandum addresses that recommendation as it pertains to the Gunnison <br />River basin. <br />2.0 DISCUSSION/ANALYSIS <br />This review of NOAA weather stations encompasses only those stations used for the Gunnison River <br />basin and as reported in the USBR's Colorado River System Consumptive Uses and Losses Report, 1981- <br />1985. The stations identified in the appendices of the report are listed in Table 1. <br />Subsequent to the Colorado River System Consumptive Uses and Losses Report, 1981-1985, USBR <br />personnel have proposed changes in weather station selection for some of the hydrologic units in <br />Colorado. These recommended changes for the Gunnison River basin are summarized in Table 2. <br />Within the Gunnison River basin, there are several NOAA weather stations that collect maximum and <br />minimum temperature and precipitation data but were not used in the USBR's 1981-85 report or the <br />proposed revisions. These stations are listed in Table 3. The listing includes only those stations with <br />recorded data from 1975. <br />Ideally, agricultural weather stations should be sited in level, open terrain representative of the local <br />agricultural environment. However, most NOAA weather stations are located in urban areas; therefore, <br />temperature measurements may not be representative. Precipitation measurements are influenced more <br />by regional topography, thus an urban versus an agricultural siting should have very little impact. Site <br />descriptions of the weather stations listed in Tables 1, 2, and 3 were provided by Nolan Doeskan, the <br />Colorado State Climatologist. A review of the descriptions indicated that most of the sites are located in <br />an urban environment. The sole exception is Cochetopa Creek, which is located on a ranch. Since the <br />data collected by NOAA are the only data available, they are recommended for use in the Colorado River <br />System Consumptive Uses and Losses Report . This review of representativeness only addresses the <br />location of the selected weather stations for each sector relative to the location of the irrigated area. <br />Recommended changes to the weather stations used in the USBR's report are based upon the following: <br /> <br />Analysis of the maximum, minimum, and average temperatures and precipitation records for <br />? <br />1980 through 1990 <br /> <br />1 <br />A 275 01.09.95 1.14-18 Walter <br />