Laserfiche WebLink
<br />AGENDA <br /> <br />Technical Review and Scoping Meeti1ng <br />I Cherry Creek Dam and Reservoir ' <br />Probable Maximum Precipitation (PMP):and <br />I I <br />Probable Maximum Flood (PMF) Analy1ses <br /> <br />To: <br /> <br />Members of the technical review team <br /> <br />From: <br /> <br />Larry Lang, Project Director, CWCB <br /> <br />F. t I. t. <br />Irs scoRmg mee mg <br />I <br />November 3, 1999 <br />City of G~eenwood Village - Municipal Building <br /> <br />Subject: <br /> <br />Discussion Items: <br /> <br />1) Membership and roles of the technical review team , <br />a) Independent revidw teams for the PMP and PMF project task~;? <br />I ': <br /> <br />2) Should the technical ~eview focus on the NWS' PMP study and Ule Corps' PMF study? <br />I, : <br />3) Determination and se~ection of the procedure for the technical re~iew <br />a) Acknowledgment I of PMP by HMR 55A and 52 guidelines an~l methods <br />b) Procedures for a site specific review ! <br />i : <br /> <br />4) Drafting of the "Req~est for Proposals" (RFP) Questions: <br />a) Evaluations of thJ parameters that govern the results of a PM}> calculation <br />b) Formulate proced~re to compute frequency and risk analyses: <br />c) Should geomorphic investigations be a part of the technical re~view <br />I <br />d) What aspects of HMR 55A and 52 do we challenge? . <br />e) Should a procedu}e be developed to perform a site-specific P~1P review? <br /> <br /> <br />5) Types of media conlt for public outreach and acceptance of the 'technical review <br /> <br /> <br />6) Outline the major tasL of a technical review <br /> <br />a:cherry creek agenda. doc <br />