Laserfiche WebLink
<br />Compact Facts <br /> <br />Colorado River Compact of 1922 <br />Allocates 7.5 million AF of consumptive use annually to ( I) <br />the Upper Colorado River Basin (those parts of Arizona, <br />Colorado, New Mexico, Utah, and Wyoming above Lee <br />Ferry, Arizona), and (2) the Lower Colorado River Basin <br />(those parts of Arizona, California, and Nevada below Lee <br />Ferry, Arizona). This Compact requires the Upper Colorado <br />River Basin to deliver an average of 75 million AF to the <br />Lower Basin during any consecutive I a-year period. The <br />Lower Basin is allowed an additional 1.0 million AF of <br />consumptive use from the Colorado River system. <br /> <br />Rio Grande, Colorado, and Tijuana Treaty of <br />1944 between the United States and Mexico <br />Guarantees delivery of 1.5 million AF of Colorado River <br />water per year to Mexico. If there is not adequate surplus <br />water to satisfy the obligation, the Upper and Lower Basins <br />are to equally share the burden of reducing uses to make <br />up any deficiencies. <br /> <br />Upper Colorado River Basin Compact of 1948 <br />Allocates the 7.5 million AF apportionment of consumptive <br />uses available to the Upper Basin as follows: <br />Arizona 50,000 AF /year <br />Colorado 51.75% <br />Utah 23% <br />Wyoming 14% <br />New Mexico 11.25% <br /> <br />Additionally, the State of Colorado may not deplete the <br />flow in the Yampa River below an aggregate of 5 million AF <br />over any I a-year period. <br /> <br />(continued) <br /> <br />Depending upon the interpretation of the Compacts, other <br />laws, and the amount of water in the river, Colorado's right <br />to the consumptive use of water under the Compacts may <br />range from 3.079 million AF to 3.855 million AF per year. <br />Colorado currently consumes an average of 2.3 million AF <br />per year with facilities in place capable of using up to 2.6 <br />million AF. Colorado's apportionment has not been divided <br />among the various subbasins within the state. The Yampa <br />and La Plata River Basins have specific delivery obligations <br />under the Compacts. The allocation and administration of <br />any surpluses and shortages under the Compacts within <br />Colorado remains open to discussion but ultimately will be <br />subject to determination and administration by the State <br />Engineer. <br /> <br />South Platte River Compact of 1923 <br /> <br />Establishes Colorado's and Nebraska's rights to use water in <br />Lodgepole Creek and the South Platte River. Nebraska has <br />the right to fully use water in Lodgepole Creek. Colorado <br />has the right to fully use water in the South Platte River <br />between October 15 and April I. Between April I and <br />October 15, if the mean flow of the South Platte River at <br />Julesburg drops below 120 cfs and water is needed for <br />beneficial use in Nebraska, water rights in Colorado <br />between the western boundary of Washington County and <br />the state line (the "Lower Section") with priority dates junior <br />to June 14, 1897 must be curtailed or augmented through <br />an approved plan. <br /> <br />Republican River Compact of 1942 <br />Establishes the rights of Colorado, Nebraska, and Kansas to <br />water in the Republican River Basin and makes specific <br />allocations of the right to make beneficial CU of water from <br />identified streams. <br /> <br />Statewide Water Supply Initiative <br />Fact Sheet <br /> <br /> <br />South PlJatte Basin <br /> <br /> <br />-----L <br /> <br />~"" <br />,-- <br />"><Un ~ <br /> <br />~ -,-J-- <br />j <br /> <br />-----1...,,,:./'1''''. "~:\i l, <br /> <br />I ~L~ <br />.....EF.A::...l I <br />~.C'.~c J.!~'ilII<J::>:< <br />MOIiTEZ'JMA r--' J -I-f../ _ <br />,/ L.....L47... I ,cosnL.l.A ,/ <br />I .a.RCHULEf.l, CONE.X::S I <br />; \ / <br /> <br />South Platte Basin Overview <br /> <br />The South Platte Basin (including the Republican <br />River Basin) covers approximately 27,660 square <br />miles in northeast Colorado. The largest cities in the <br />basin are Denver (population 560,882), Aurora <br />(population 287,216), and Lakewood (population <br />144,150). The topographic characteristics of the <br />South Platte Basin are diverse. Elevations in the basin <br />range from over 14,000 feet at the headwaters near <br />the Continental Divide to 3,400 feet at the Colorado/ <br />Nebraska state line. The headwaters of the South <br />Platte River originate at an elevation of about <br />I 1,500 feet. The South Platte River emerges out of <br />the mountains southwest of the Denver metro <br />region, flows through the Denver metropolitan <br />urban area, and then enters the High Plains Region. <br /> <br />Approximately one-third of the basin's land area is <br />publicly owned, and the majority of these lands are <br />forest areas in the mountains. Western portions of <br />the basin and its montane and subalpine areas are <br />primarily forested, while the High Plains region is <br />mainly grassland and planted/cultivated land. This <br />includes the Pawnee Natural Grassland. <br /> <br />Major Imports into the Basin <br /> <br />Major Storage Projects <br /> <br /> Normal Storage <br />ReseNoir (AF) <br />Horsetooth Reservoir 1 52,000 <br />Carter Lake 112,200 <br />Eleven Mile Canyon Reservoir 97,800 <br />Cheesman Reservoir 79,064 <br />North Sterling 74,590 <br />Riverside Reservoir 63,302 <br />Spinney Mountain Reservoir 53,873 <br />Standley Lake 43,344 <br />Gross Reservoir 41,811 <br />Empire Reservoir 37,710 <br />Jackson Reservoir 35,415 <br />Aurora Reservoir 32,400 <br />Barr Lake 32,100 <br />Milton Reservoir 29,732 <br />Prewitt Reservoir 28,840 <br />Julesburg Reservoir 28,178 <br />Chatfield Reservoir 26,600 <br />Antero Reservoir 25,618 <br />Marston Reservoir 19,795 <br />Horse Creek Reservoir 18,747 <br />Button Rock Reservoir 16,080 <br />Cherry Creek Reservoir 13,226 <br /> <br />Source: Colorado Division of Water Resources Office of Dam Safety Database. <br /> <br /> Average <br /> Recipient Diversions <br />Name Stream (AF) <br />1 Adams Tunnel Big Thompson R. 218,142 <br />2 Moffat Tunnel South Platte R. 52,155 <br />3 Roberts Tunnel South Platte R. 53,676 <br />4 Grand River Ditch Cache La Poudre R. 17,685 <br />5 Laramie-Poudre Canal Cache La Poudre R. 18,580 <br />6 Aurora Homestake South Platte R. 12,382 <br />7 Michigan Ditch Cache La Poudre R. 3,294 <br />8 Wilson Supply Ditch Cache La Poudre R. 1,482 <br /> <br />Major Exports from the Basin <br />None <br /> <br />Water Conservancy Districts <br /> <br />Central Colorado Lower South Platte <br />Logan County Northern Colorado <br />St. Vrain and Lefthand Badger and Beaver <br />Upper South Platte Sedgwick-Sand Draws <br />Center of Colorado <br /> <br />*Continental Hoosier Tunnel exports from the Colorado Basin to the Arkansas <br />Basin through a portion of the South Platte Basin. <br /> <br />Source: Division 1 1998 Annual Report, 1 O-year averages. <br /> <br />Additional information on this River Basin is available at http://www.cwcb.state.co.us <br /> <br />Bill Owens <br />Governor <br /> <br />South Platte Basin Water <br />Management Issues <br /> <br />Russell George <br />Department of Natural <br />Resources <br />Executive Director <br /> <br />The South Platte Basin will face <br />several key points and challenges <br />with respect to water management <br />issues and needs over the next <br />30 years. The following provides an <br />overview of some of the points and challenges that <br />have been identified. <br /> <br />Rod Kuharich <br />Colorado Water <br />Conservation Board <br />Director <br /> <br />. Colorado's most diverse and industrialized basin. <br />Agriculture is still a dominant water use but rapid <br />changes are occurring and the impacts to rural <br />communities are a key concern. <br /> <br />. Competition for water is fierce and it is unclear how <br />much competition there is for the same water <br />supplies. <br /> <br />. The success of the Upper Colorado Recovery <br />Implementation Program for Colorado River <br />Endangered Fish is important. The Recovery <br />Program is designed to address the recovery needs <br />of the Colorado River endangered fish while <br />protecting existing water uses and allowing for the <br />future use of Colorado River water in compliance <br />with Interstate Compacts, Treaties, and applicable <br />federal and state law "the Law of the Colorado <br />River." <br /> <br />. The lack of any new major water storage in the last <br />20 years has led to reliance on non-renewable <br />groundwater in Douglas, Arapahoe, and northern EI <br />Paso (EI Paso County is in the Arkansas Basin) <br />counties. Explosive growth in these counties coupled <br />with the lack of surface water supplies led to the <br />creation of multiple small water districts and makes <br />coordinated water development a challenge and less <br />efficient, especially in light of limited renewable <br />surface water supplies. <br /> <br />(Continued on page 3) <br /> <br /> <br />Beaver Ponds at Chatfield Reservoir <br />(photo courtesy of Colorado State Parks) <br /> <br />February 2006 <br />