<br />Compact Facts
<br />
<br />Colorado River Compact of 1922
<br />Allocates 7.5 million AF of consumptive use annually to ( I)
<br />the Upper Colorado River Basin (those parts of Arizona,
<br />Colorado, New Mexico, Utah, and Wyoming above Lee
<br />Ferry, Arizona), and (2) the Lower Colorado River Basin
<br />(those parts of Arizona, California, and Nevada below Lee
<br />Ferry, Arizona). This Compact requires the Upper Colorado
<br />River Basin to deliver an average of 75 million AF to the
<br />Lower Basin during any consecutive I a-year period. The
<br />Lower Basin is allowed an additional 1.0 million AF of
<br />consumptive use from the Colorado River system.
<br />
<br />Rio Grande, Colorado, and Tijuana Treaty of
<br />1944 between the United States and Mexico
<br />Guarantees delivery of 1.5 million AF of Colorado River
<br />water per year to Mexico. If there is not adequate surplus
<br />water to satisfy the obligation, the Upper and Lower Basins
<br />are to equally share the burden of reducing uses to make
<br />up any deficiencies.
<br />
<br />Upper Colorado River Basin Compact of 1948
<br />Allocates the 7.5 million AF apportionment of consumptive
<br />uses available to the Upper Basin as follows:
<br />Arizona 50,000 AF /year
<br />Colorado 51.75%
<br />Utah 23%
<br />Wyoming 14%
<br />New Mexico 11.25%
<br />
<br />Additionally, the State of Colorado may not deplete the
<br />flow in the Yampa River below an aggregate of 5 million AF
<br />over any I a-year period.
<br />
<br />(continued)
<br />
<br />Depending upon the interpretation of the Compacts, other
<br />laws, and the amount of water in the river, Colorado's right
<br />to the consumptive use of water under the Compacts may
<br />range from 3.079 million AF to 3.855 million AF per year.
<br />Colorado currently consumes an average of 2.3 million AF
<br />per year with facilities in place capable of using up to 2.6
<br />million AF. Colorado's apportionment has not been divided
<br />among the various subbasins within the state. The Yampa
<br />and La Plata River Basins have specific delivery obligations
<br />under the Compacts. The allocation and administration of
<br />any surpluses and shortages under the Compacts within
<br />Colorado remains open to discussion but ultimately will be
<br />subject to determination and administration by the State
<br />Engineer.
<br />
<br />South Platte River Compact of 1923
<br />
<br />Establishes Colorado's and Nebraska's rights to use water in
<br />Lodgepole Creek and the South Platte River. Nebraska has
<br />the right to fully use water in Lodgepole Creek. Colorado
<br />has the right to fully use water in the South Platte River
<br />between October 15 and April I. Between April I and
<br />October 15, if the mean flow of the South Platte River at
<br />Julesburg drops below 120 cfs and water is needed for
<br />beneficial use in Nebraska, water rights in Colorado
<br />between the western boundary of Washington County and
<br />the state line (the "Lower Section") with priority dates junior
<br />to June 14, 1897 must be curtailed or augmented through
<br />an approved plan.
<br />
<br />Republican River Compact of 1942
<br />Establishes the rights of Colorado, Nebraska, and Kansas to
<br />water in the Republican River Basin and makes specific
<br />allocations of the right to make beneficial CU of water from
<br />identified streams.
<br />
<br />Statewide Water Supply Initiative
<br />Fact Sheet
<br />
<br />
<br />South PlJatte Basin
<br />
<br />
<br />-----L
<br />
<br />~""
<br />,--
<br />"><Un ~
<br />
<br />~ -,-J--
<br />j
<br />
<br />-----1...,,,:./'1''''. "~:\i l,
<br />
<br />I ~L~
<br />.....EF.A::...l I
<br />~.C'.~c J.!~'ilII<J::>:<
<br />MOIiTEZ'JMA r--' J -I-f../ _
<br />,/ L.....L47... I ,cosnL.l.A ,/
<br />I .a.RCHULEf.l, CONE.X::S I
<br />; \ /
<br />
<br />South Platte Basin Overview
<br />
<br />The South Platte Basin (including the Republican
<br />River Basin) covers approximately 27,660 square
<br />miles in northeast Colorado. The largest cities in the
<br />basin are Denver (population 560,882), Aurora
<br />(population 287,216), and Lakewood (population
<br />144,150). The topographic characteristics of the
<br />South Platte Basin are diverse. Elevations in the basin
<br />range from over 14,000 feet at the headwaters near
<br />the Continental Divide to 3,400 feet at the Colorado/
<br />Nebraska state line. The headwaters of the South
<br />Platte River originate at an elevation of about
<br />I 1,500 feet. The South Platte River emerges out of
<br />the mountains southwest of the Denver metro
<br />region, flows through the Denver metropolitan
<br />urban area, and then enters the High Plains Region.
<br />
<br />Approximately one-third of the basin's land area is
<br />publicly owned, and the majority of these lands are
<br />forest areas in the mountains. Western portions of
<br />the basin and its montane and subalpine areas are
<br />primarily forested, while the High Plains region is
<br />mainly grassland and planted/cultivated land. This
<br />includes the Pawnee Natural Grassland.
<br />
<br />Major Imports into the Basin
<br />
<br />Major Storage Projects
<br />
<br /> Normal Storage
<br />ReseNoir (AF)
<br />Horsetooth Reservoir 1 52,000
<br />Carter Lake 112,200
<br />Eleven Mile Canyon Reservoir 97,800
<br />Cheesman Reservoir 79,064
<br />North Sterling 74,590
<br />Riverside Reservoir 63,302
<br />Spinney Mountain Reservoir 53,873
<br />Standley Lake 43,344
<br />Gross Reservoir 41,811
<br />Empire Reservoir 37,710
<br />Jackson Reservoir 35,415
<br />Aurora Reservoir 32,400
<br />Barr Lake 32,100
<br />Milton Reservoir 29,732
<br />Prewitt Reservoir 28,840
<br />Julesburg Reservoir 28,178
<br />Chatfield Reservoir 26,600
<br />Antero Reservoir 25,618
<br />Marston Reservoir 19,795
<br />Horse Creek Reservoir 18,747
<br />Button Rock Reservoir 16,080
<br />Cherry Creek Reservoir 13,226
<br />
<br />Source: Colorado Division of Water Resources Office of Dam Safety Database.
<br />
<br /> Average
<br /> Recipient Diversions
<br />Name Stream (AF)
<br />1 Adams Tunnel Big Thompson R. 218,142
<br />2 Moffat Tunnel South Platte R. 52,155
<br />3 Roberts Tunnel South Platte R. 53,676
<br />4 Grand River Ditch Cache La Poudre R. 17,685
<br />5 Laramie-Poudre Canal Cache La Poudre R. 18,580
<br />6 Aurora Homestake South Platte R. 12,382
<br />7 Michigan Ditch Cache La Poudre R. 3,294
<br />8 Wilson Supply Ditch Cache La Poudre R. 1,482
<br />
<br />Major Exports from the Basin
<br />None
<br />
<br />Water Conservancy Districts
<br />
<br />Central Colorado Lower South Platte
<br />Logan County Northern Colorado
<br />St. Vrain and Lefthand Badger and Beaver
<br />Upper South Platte Sedgwick-Sand Draws
<br />Center of Colorado
<br />
<br />*Continental Hoosier Tunnel exports from the Colorado Basin to the Arkansas
<br />Basin through a portion of the South Platte Basin.
<br />
<br />Source: Division 1 1998 Annual Report, 1 O-year averages.
<br />
<br />Additional information on this River Basin is available at http://www.cwcb.state.co.us
<br />
<br />Bill Owens
<br />Governor
<br />
<br />South Platte Basin Water
<br />Management Issues
<br />
<br />Russell George
<br />Department of Natural
<br />Resources
<br />Executive Director
<br />
<br />The South Platte Basin will face
<br />several key points and challenges
<br />with respect to water management
<br />issues and needs over the next
<br />30 years. The following provides an
<br />overview of some of the points and challenges that
<br />have been identified.
<br />
<br />Rod Kuharich
<br />Colorado Water
<br />Conservation Board
<br />Director
<br />
<br />. Colorado's most diverse and industrialized basin.
<br />Agriculture is still a dominant water use but rapid
<br />changes are occurring and the impacts to rural
<br />communities are a key concern.
<br />
<br />. Competition for water is fierce and it is unclear how
<br />much competition there is for the same water
<br />supplies.
<br />
<br />. The success of the Upper Colorado Recovery
<br />Implementation Program for Colorado River
<br />Endangered Fish is important. The Recovery
<br />Program is designed to address the recovery needs
<br />of the Colorado River endangered fish while
<br />protecting existing water uses and allowing for the
<br />future use of Colorado River water in compliance
<br />with Interstate Compacts, Treaties, and applicable
<br />federal and state law "the Law of the Colorado
<br />River."
<br />
<br />. The lack of any new major water storage in the last
<br />20 years has led to reliance on non-renewable
<br />groundwater in Douglas, Arapahoe, and northern EI
<br />Paso (EI Paso County is in the Arkansas Basin)
<br />counties. Explosive growth in these counties coupled
<br />with the lack of surface water supplies led to the
<br />creation of multiple small water districts and makes
<br />coordinated water development a challenge and less
<br />efficient, especially in light of limited renewable
<br />surface water supplies.
<br />
<br />(Continued on page 3)
<br />
<br />
<br />Beaver Ponds at Chatfield Reservoir
<br />(photo courtesy of Colorado State Parks)
<br />
<br />February 2006
<br />
|