WSP09513 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

e e e 001525 Ch....:.l. p<;>. tt:r G.. "" FYI,If t"''''_.......+- ASPINALL UNIT ACCOUNTING ISSUES APRIL 5, 1996 R~ Back in January, 1992 Reclamation and the National Park Service (NPS) entered into discussions with the state of Colorado concerning the development ofa water service contract for the NPS which would help address issues associated with the federal reserved water right quantification for the Black Canyon ofthe Gunnison National Monument. Accordingly, the NEP A process for this contract was initiated and a "Scoping Report for the Gunnison River Contract" issued in March 1993, In addition, since 1992, Reclan1ation and the NPS have used an example contract accounting process on strictly a trial basis during the Aspinall Unit operations meetings held in January, April and late August of each year, The state of Colorado remains willing to discuss the accounting issues and work towards there resolution, However, we have spent numerous hours working on this contract and related issues already and are of the opinion that not a great deal of progress will be made until the needs of the federal reserved water right and the endangered fish are clearly identified, It was apparent in the scoping meetings that Gunnison Basin interests are not going to buy into any contract or accounting procedure until the quantities of water required by the Monument and the endangered fish are firmly identified and justified, One of the most constructive things the NPS could do from Colorado's standpoint is to identify the amounts of water it would seek in its quantification case. Absent such information, or a well defined process for providing the information, the state of Colorado will be reluctant to spend significant time working on accounting issues. Given that a final biological opinion for Aspinall is not expected until May, 1998 there is no urgent need to complete an accounting, but work toward the resolution of as may of the potential accounting issues as reasonably possible is worthwhile, The purpose of this issue paper is to briefly recount the significant issues which the NPS contract accounting must address, Please bear in mind this is the first attempt to recount the significant issues in almost three years and thus it should be considered preliminary and subject to change. Also, as you are aware, there are a number of related questions that surround each accounting issue identified below, The Scoping Report and attached comment letters should be consulted for a more complete discussion of the issues, Furthern1Ore, it may not be necessary to include each item below in the accounting, but the accounting narrative should clearly show that each item was considered and indicate how it was treated. The accounting parameters, issues and questions are as follows: 1, Blue Mesa Reservoir Target Elevations Fill by the end of July; Drawdown to 581,000 AF of live storage by December 31 each year; Do not draw below minimum power pool elevation if at all possible. 2. Blue Mesa Storage Accounts Blue Mesa Storage Decrees;