Laserfiche WebLink
<br />( <br /> <br />discontinuation of the original plan <br /> <br />and a shift to a new one. <br /> <br />b. A conditional water right that was <br /> <br />infeasible at its original point of <br /> <br />diversion might be feasible at another. <br /> <br />If a change of a conditional water. <br /> <br />right to a new point of diversion is <br /> <br />not permitted, then the original water <br /> <br />project could fail and never burden the <br /> <br />stream. But if a change is permitted, <br /> <br />the prOject could get new life and <br /> <br />require all others to account for its <br /> <br />i. <br />< <br /> <br />potential draft on the stream at the <br /> <br />new point of diversion. <br /> <br />2. This policy question has been resolved by <br />the Colorado General Assembly in favor of <br />permitting changes of conditional water <br /> <br />rights. <br /> <br />a. Conditional water rights include the <br /> <br />same right to change the right as other <br /> <br />water rights. <br /> <br />C.R.S. Section 37-92- <br /> <br />103(5); Twin Lakes Reservoir and Canal <br /> <br />Co. v.Aspen, 568 P2d 45 (Colo. 1977); <br /> <br /> <br />Judgement and Decree in Case NO. 2686, <br /> <br /> <br />Wat~r Division No. 5 at 10 (George E. <br /> <br />Lohr, Water Judge). An excerpt from <br /> <br />11 <br />