My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
WSP08358
CWCB
>
Water Supply Protection
>
Backfile
>
8001-9000
>
WSP08358
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/26/2010 2:47:52 PM
Creation date
10/12/2006 2:55:43 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Water Supply Protection
File Number
7630.175
Description
Wild and Scenic-Dolores River
State
CO
Basin
San Juan/Dolores
Water Division
7
Date
5/9/1975
Title
Dolores Study-Wild and Scenic-Corresp Reports tech etc 1968-81-Dolores Wild and Scenic River Study Report Outline-Draft 2
Water Supply Pro - Doc Type
Report/Study
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
10
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />By Whom <br /> <br />Due Ds.te <br /> <br />r <br /> <br />. <br />3. NED Plan <br /> <br />State, assisted <br />by ERS, FS, B1;." <br />BuRec, & OOR <br />FS-ERS-State <br /> <br />6/25 <br /> <br />Display af Effects on Four Accounts <br />(EQ, 12D, Re"ional Development, & <br />Social Well 3eing) <br />Analyze Alternatives & Options & <br />Array for National Level Revie~ <br /> <br />G. <br /> <br />, <br /> <br />7/15 Y <br /> <br />State-FS-BOR-BLM <br /> <br />H. <br /> <br />BOR (Responsible <br />for Chapte!"), <br />assisted by FS <br />BLM & State <br /> <br />RECOMlo\EriDED PROPOSED ACTION Y <br />(This may be the EQ Plan, t:oe :'"ED Plan <br />or a combination of EQ & ~"ED alternatives) <br /> <br />OOR submit <br />preliminary <br />material to <br />FS by 7/15 <br />FS Complete <br />in final (after <br />W.O, guidance <br />by 8/13 <br /> <br />VI <br /> <br />Introduction (To include a disclaimer <br />stating that this plan is conceptual <br />and that a master plan for the area <br />will be developed by the management <br />agency or agencies.) <br />Management Objectives (To des~~i"~ .j~ f~rpose of the plan.) <br />The objectives s:oould be described for each type of segment. <br />(Wild, Scenic, or Recreational - Page 2 of Guidelines) <br />The fO'lr objectives are to: <br /> <br />1. Prvtect the land and river from si~~ificant degradation within <br />the river area boundary (generally the priw~ry line of s~~ht <br />corrider); and protect "outstand<ngly remarkable" characteristics <br />~ithin the river area boundary. <br /> <br />A. <br /> <br />I, <br /> <br />B. <br /> <br />2. Prc':ide recreation opportunities wi thin tOne river bOl,;.ndary, in '1 <br />manner ~hich does not exceed its carrying capacity. <br /> <br />3. Provide for other goods and services from the land and resource <br />w;:..!;)\,; vithi:: ~he river area bO.L~1ary ir! a :nanner consiste~t '.dt~ <br />objectives 1 and 2. <br /> <br />4. Provide fo~ management of associated lands (outside of river area <br />boundary) in a manner ~hich will contribute to scenic and other <br />amenity values associated ~ith public enjoyment of ~ild, scenic <br />and recreational river areas. <br /> <br />C. The River Area involved in the Pranosed Action: the location and size <br />(total length of river in miles and total area in acres) of the area <br />proposed for inclusion in the system ~ith text and map(s). Map(s) <br />should display all segments proposed for differing classifications and <br />study segments not proposed for inclusion. Segments should be <br />identified in the text and maps with a numerical and/or alphabetical <br />code far reference purposes. A table may be used to summarize the <br />different segments and their classifications.) <br /> <br />This date must not be prior to the last series of public meetings. <br /> <br />Certain aspects of this chapter may be drafted by the 7/20 draft Report date. <br />Alternatives and options will be made visible in 7/20 draft Report but <br />recommendations will be left to National-State Policy Group revie~ (7/24-8/13). <br />In the event field level group concensus cannot be achieved, separate views <br />may be expressed as attachments to the revie~ draft study report, or otherwise. <br /> <br />y <br />Y <br /> <br />0663 5/9/75 <br /> <br />-4- <br /> <br />........ <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.