Laserfiche WebLink
<br />" " ~, l ~. 3 <br />~ ~ ,,", , -' <br />u::.....I::...; i.'~ <br /> <br />Quantity and Quality of Ground-Water Discharge to the <br />South Platte River, Denver to Fort Lupton, Colorado, <br />August 1992 Through July 1993 <br /> <br />By Peter B. McMahon, Kenneth J. Lull, Kevin F. Dennehy, and Jim A. Collins <br /> <br />Abstract <br /> <br />Water-quality studies conducted by the <br />Metro Wastewater Reclamation District have <br />indicated that during low flow in segments <br />ofthe South Platte River between Denver and <br />Fort Lupton, concentrations of dissolved oxygen <br />are less than minimum concentrations set by <br />the State of Colorado. Low dissolved-oxygen <br />concentrations are observed in two reaches of <br />the river-they are about 3.3 to 6.4 miles and <br />17 to 25 miles downstream from the Metro <br />Wastewater Reclamation District effluent outfalls. <br />Conccntrations of dissolved oxygen recover <br />between these two reaches. Studies conducted by <br />the U.S. Geological SUlvey have indicated that <br />ground-water discharge to the river may contribute <br />to these low dissolved-oxygen concentrations. As <br />a result, an assessment was made of the quantity <br />and quality of ground-water discharge to the <br />South Platte River from Denver to Fort Lupton. <br />Measurements of surface-water and ground-water <br />discharge and collections of surface water and <br />ground water for water-quality analyses were <br />made from August 1992 through January 1993 and <br />in May and July 1993. The quantity of ground- <br />water discharge to the South Platte River was <br />determined indirectly by mass balance of surface- <br />water inflows and outflows and directly by instan- <br />taneous measurements of ground-water discharge <br />across the sediment/waterinterface in the river <br />channel. The quality of surface water and ground <br />water was determined by sampling and analysis of <br />water from the river and monitoring wells <br />screened in the alluvial aquifer adjacent to the <br />river and by sampling and analysis of water from <br />piezometers screened in sediments underlying the <br />liver channel. <br /> <br />The ground-water flow system was sub- <br />divided into a large-area and a small-area flow <br />system. The precise boundaries of the two flow <br />systems are not known. However, the large-area <br />flow system is considered to incorporate all allu- <br />vial sediments in hydrologic connection with the <br />South Platte River. The small-area flow system is <br />considered to incorporate the alluvial aquifer in <br />the vicinity of the river. Flow-path lengths in the <br />large-area flow system were considered to be on <br />the order of hundreds of feet to more than a mile, <br />whereas in the small-area flow system, they were <br />considered to be on the order of feet to hundreds <br />of feet. Mass-balance estimates of incremental <br />ground-water discharge from the large-area flow <br />system ranged from -27 to 17 cubic feet per <br />second per mile in three reaches of the river; the <br />median rate was 4.6 cubic feet per second per mile. <br />The median percentage of surface-water discharge <br />derived from ground-water discharge in the river <br />reaches studied was 13 percent. Instantaneous <br />measurements of ground-water discharge from the <br />small-area flow system ranged from -1,360 to <br />1,000 cubic feet per second per mile, with a <br />median value of -5.8 cubic feet per second per <br />mile. Hourly measurements of discharge from the <br />small-area flow system indicated that the high <br />rates of discharge were transient and may have <br />been caused by daily fluctuations in river stage due <br />to changing effluent-discharge rates from the <br />Metro Wastewater Reclamation District treatment <br />plant. Higher river stages caused surface water to <br />infiltrate bed sediments underlying the river chan- <br />nel, and lower river stages allowed ground water <br />to discharge into the river. Although stage <br />changes apparently cycled large quantities of <br />water in and out of the small-area flow system, the <br />process probably provided no net gain or loss of <br /> <br /> <br />Abstract 1 <br />