Laserfiche WebLink
<br />002[l02 <br /> <br />shall be excluded in determining the amount of curtailment to be ~e.V <br />r <br /> <br />With respect to the claimed preferred status of Indian rights" <br />the following statement was made by Mr. Warner, one of the attorneys <br />for the United States in the pending case of, Arizona vs. California, <br />in the United States Supreme Court, at San Francisco, on August 12, <br /> <br />1957: <br /> <br />"The reservation (of water) is the act (of the <br />United States) by which the unappropriated waters <br />involved are set apart for the purposes of the <br />reservation and insulated against subsequent appro- <br />priationsby members of the public (under applicable <br />state or territorial laws)." <br /> <br />The Navajo Indian Reservation was established by Treaty on <br />June 1, 1868. If the above contention of the United States, <br />in Arizona vs.California, is upheld by the Supreme Court as <br />a part of the "Law of the River"", the result would be this, <br />among others: <br />(a) Rights of the Navajo Indians would be supplied as <br />senior to and preferred over all rights to the use of the <br />water of the affected streams which vested after June 1, 1868. <br /> <br />(b) In the low runoff period of years such as the one <br />ending with water year 1956, all rights on the affected <br />streams, either in New Mexico or Colorado, which became <br />vested after June 1, 1868, would be involved to the extent <br />necessary to make up any shortage which in that year, or any <br />other similar year, would have been eXperienced by the Navajo <br />Project. <br /> <br />An agreement with the Navajo Indian Tribal Council contem- <br />plates the sharing in New Mexico of streamflow and reservoir water <br />between the Navajo Project and other new uses in years of low runoff. <br /> <br />It would appear on the surface that if this sharing prin- <br />ciple should result in consumptive use by new projects in New Mexico <br />other than the Navajo Project in such years, then under the compact <br />new uses in Colorado also would be entitled to some consumptive use. <br /> <br />In this case, curtailment of new Colorado uses would be such that <br /> <br /> <br />their shortages would approach the same percentages as those indi- <br /> <br /> <br />cated in the analyses under Criteria No. ,1 and No.2. <br /> <br />-12- <br /> <br />L.::_ <br /> <br />". <br /> <br />.~- -.;,~ ," " <br /> <br />< ~ <br /> <br />. r J' <br />, ,", ;~j,ilii <br />::h>__'-'''Ji_ =__ <br />