WSP08323 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

The fact of the matter is, that when water is diverted to the Eastern Slope, it is lost forever to Western Colorado counties. without some form of substantial mitigation, the only consequences are negative ones from the Western Slope perspective. But when water goes down the Western Slope--even if it's [sic] ultimate destina- tion is California--the benefits, both present and potential, are considerable indeed: esthetically, there are the simple pleasures of babbling brook [sic]; recrea- tionally, the water support [sic] fisheries, wildlife, vegetation, boating, camping, snowmaking, and other activities. Growth- wise, so long as there is water in the streambed, the possibility exists for future storage--whether for municipal, industrial, recreational, or energy use. All things appear possible to Western Coloradoans while water remains in the streambed, but when it is removed across the peaks, the options dwindle rapid1y.6 Perspectives on area of origin protection can shift rapidly depending on the area being considered. In Colorado, some of those who oppose area of origin protection for the West Slope are strongly in favor of protect i ng Colorado's share of Colorado River water as against lower basin states. What is an area of origin, and, under what circumstances should such areas receive special consideration when transbasin diversions of waters from such areas are undertaken? As we will discuss below, the approaches that have been taken vary enormously--perhaps reflect- ing the wide variation in political interests within these states. We believe that there are legitimate interests that should 6David Annual Water Mott, "The West Side Story," Presentation at Workshop, Gunnison, Colorado, Aug. 1, 1985. 10th 5