Laserfiche WebLink
<br />. 1"'., ., <br />iUl.-t <br /> <br />added subsequently, salinity is <br />expected to then return to or below <br />the criteria level. Periodic salinity <br />increases above the criteria as a result <br />of low reservoir conditions or periods <br />of below long-time average river flow <br />would also be acceptable within the <br />standards, Return to normal <br />conditions is expected to cause <br />salinity concentrations to return to or <br />below the criteria level. <br /> <br />Salinity Control for Mexico <br /> <br />During the year, the Bureau of <br />Reclamation worked on engineering <br />plans and specifications for the <br />104-million-gallon per day desalting <br />plant and the other facilities and <br />measures necessary to implement the <br />1973 agreement with Mexico on <br />Colorado River salinity (Minute No. <br />242 of the International Boundary and <br />Water Commission). The desalting <br />plant and other measures were <br />authorized by Title I of P.L. 93-320, <br />which is described in the Board's <br />1974 Annual Report. <br />The estimated costs for the Title I <br />facilities have increased substantially <br />since passage of P.L 93-320, when <br />the costs were estimated to be $155.5 <br />million. The Bureau of Reclamation's <br />current cost esitmates for the facilities <br />as of October 1975, is $269 million. <br />This increase is due to inflation in <br />construction costs and changes in <br />design. This estimate could change <br />depending upon final design and bids <br />received for construction, <br />Of special interest to California is <br />the provision in Title I for constructing <br />a new concrete-lined canal to replace <br />the first 49 miles of the Coachella <br />Canal. The United States will be <br />entitled to temporary use of a quantity <br />of water equal to the quantity <br />conserved by the new canal for the <br />purpose of meeting the salinity control <br />objectives of Minute No, 242. <br />Seepage water from the present <br /> <br />8 <br /> <br />T---_ <br />I :--____ <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />, <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />, <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />, <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />I N <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />\ e Carson City <br /> <br /> <br />canal has created a fish and wildlife <br />habitat which will be sharply reduced <br />by constructing the lined canal, and <br />the Department of the Interior's <br />Solicitor's office has held that these <br />habitat losses must be mitigated in <br />accordance with federal law, <br />Accordingly, an ad hoc committee <br />was establised to advise the Bureau of <br />Reclamation on fish and wildlife <br />mitigation measures that would be <br />acceptable to both the fish and game <br />agencies and to the concerned water <br />districts. The Colorado River Board is <br />represented on the committee. During <br />the year, the ad hoc committee <br />developed several mitigation measures <br />which will be incorporated into a <br />program for consideration by the <br />Bureau of Reclamation. <br /> <br />"\ <br /> <br />Colorado River Basin Salinity Control <br />Program <br /> <br />, <br /> <br />"" <br /> <br />The Bureau of Reclamation <br />continued its planning studies and <br />investigations during 1975 on the four <br />salinity control units authorized for <br />construction by Title II of P.L. 93-320: <br />Paradox Valley Unit, Colorado; Grand <br />Valley Unit, Colorado; Crystal Geyser <br />Unit, Utah; and Las Vegas Wash Unit, <br />Nevada. The Bureau also continued its <br />planning studies on the twelve <br />potential salinity control studies <br />specified in P.L. 93-320, The Bureau's <br />studies were reported to be on <br />schedule for completion of Definite <br />Plan Reports for each of the four <br />authorized units from July to October <br />1976, and for the preparation of a <br />draft environmental impact statement <br />on the program by the spring of 1976. <br />Better scheduling of irrigation water <br />to irrigators is expected to be a major <br />tool in reducing the pickup of <br />dissolved salts in the Colorado River <br />Basin, The Bureau's program to <br />accomplish this scheduling, called <br />Irrigation Management Services, has <br />been initiated in each of the <br />authorized and potential project areas <br />\:'Vherein irrigation is believed to <br />contribute to salt pickup. During 1975, <br />only a small fraction of the irrigated <br />lands received the Irrigation <br />Management Services, but the Bureau <br /> <br />Los Angeles <br />~. <br /> <br />E <br /> <br />v <br /> <br />\ <br /> <br />\ <br /> <br />\ <br /> <br />\ <br /> <br />(} <br />-1.( <br />/,p <br />C <br /> <br />San Diegoe <br />