My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
WSP08301
CWCB
>
Water Supply Protection
>
Backfile
>
8001-9000
>
WSP08301
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/26/2010 2:47:41 PM
Creation date
10/12/2006 2:53:13 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Water Supply Protection
File Number
8273.100.50
Description
Colorado River Basin Salinity Control - Federal Agency Reports - BOR
Basin
Colorado Mainstem
Water Division
5
Date
2/1/1988
Title
Estimating Economic Impacts of Salinity of the Colorado River - Final Report - February 1988
Water Supply Pro - Doc Type
Report/Study
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
97
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS <br /> <br />~ j .:;, <br /> <br />N <br />O'l The authors are grateful for the assistance of a numher of people who gave generously of time <br />-.J and expertise during this research. Everyone interviewed took time and care in answering ques <br />""1 tions and searching out information. However, certain people deserve special thanks. <br /> <br />Ernest M. Weber, Colorado River Board of California, not only provided advice and guidance <br />but became so interested in the study that he pursued individual research that is reOected in the <br />discussion of Colorado River hardness. He also supplied information and interpretations to the <br />Colorado River Salinity Control Forum Work Group and to the Colorado River Water Quality <br />Office, USBR, which greatly assisted the conduct of this study. <br /> <br />J. Andrew Schlange, Manager of the Santa Ana Watershed Project Authority, spent nearly two <br />days opening the workings, history, and plans of his Agency to this study. <br /> <br />Members of the three California Rcgional Water Quality Control Boards covered by this study <br />devoted time and thought to our queries on several occasions. In particular, we thank Jim Ben- <br />netL from Riverside, Ladin Delaney from San Diego, and Dennis Dasker from Los Angeles. <br /> <br />Tim Henley and Steve Olson of Arizona's Department of Water Resources developed contacts <br />and set meetings for us in Phoenix and TucsoD. <br /> <br />George Blake of the Colorado River Commission of Nevada provided a comprehensive list of <br />contacts and suggestions for interviews in the Las Vegas Valley. <br /> <br />Staff of the Metropolitan Water District of Southern California, listed in Appendix B, contri- <br />buted many hours to seek answers to our questions. <br /> <br />Staff and officials of the City of San Diego and the San Diego Water Authority spent extra time <br />and effort on this project. <br /> <br />.1 <br /> <br />The Colorado River Water Quality Office, our sponsor, was consistently helpful and responsive <br />to requests for information. <br /> <br />Finally, the authors wish to thank everyone not mentioned by name for their time, effort, and <br />courtesy. As usual, those with information are unfailingly willing to share it. For this we are <br />especially grateful. <br /> <br />ix <br /> <br />~-, - <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.