<br />34 Estimating Economic Impacts of Salinity...
<br />
<br />l'V
<br />-.l
<br />l-
<br />i-"
<br />
<br />Health Services to set standard performance
<br />levels for water treatment systems and requires
<br />that systems be certified before sale. The other
<br />law makes illegal the practice of making false
<br />statements about the quality of tap water or to
<br />overstate the effectiveness of treatment systems
<br />offered for sale or rental.20
<br />
<br />Articles, such as "Should Tap Water Be For
<br />Drinking," in the September 1986 California
<br />Magazille have focussed concern on toxic con-
<br />tamination of drinking water while recognizing
<br />that many consumers seem to prefer the taste of
<br />bottled water. A September 8, 1986, article in
<br />the Riverside Press-Enterprise is headlined "Bot-
<br />tled Water-Sales Soaring With Contamination
<br />Scares." The article notes that while California's
<br />bottled water purchases remain high, consumers
<br />elsewhere in the country are buying more bottled
<br />water as they begin to fear their tap water is con-
<br />taminated. Still, it is clear that taste, or percep-
<br />tion of better taste, plays a role in the consump-
<br />tion of bottled water. It is less clear that the
<br />taste perception is related to salinity since bot-
<br />tied water sales are among the highest in the
<br />country in Los Angeles County which receives
<br />very little Colorado River water and is generally
<br />supplied with low TDS water. Orange County
<br />and the rest of Southern California are much
<br />more widely supplied with Colorado River water
<br />and more saline groundwater, yet taste is a sig-
<br />nificantly lower factor in bottled water purchases
<br />according to the survey's results.
<br />
<br />Costs of bottled water can be linked to
<br />salinity damages insofar as salinity is propor-
<br />tional to hardness, which causes increases in
<br />home water softening that affects taste, or when
<br />salinity is itself so high as to cause noticeable
<br />taste effects. Usually, that level cannot be deter-
<br />mined without reference to a more complete
<br />range of water constituents. However, the
<br />proportional TDS!hardness relationship found in
<br />Colorado River water does not hold in some
<br />areas served by local water supplies. Water
<br />hardness, which causes more home water
<br />
<br />softening, changes "the content and taste of
<br />water unfavorably and thus contribute(sJ to
<br />wider use of bottled water.,,21
<br />
<br />Types of Economic Damages
<br />to Households
<br />
<br />A number of previous studies have inves-
<br />tigated the relationship between water quality
<br />and consumer costs. As discussed above, there
<br />may not be any direct relationship between a
<br />single water constituent and damage to a
<br />household item. Even so, most of these studies
<br />have singled out TDS or hardness as water con-
<br />stituents that are known to cause damage and
<br />also are usually identified in the samples of study
<br />area water quality.
<br />
<br />Previous studies.
<br />In one of the earlier (1972) studies, Metcalf
<br />and Eddy's 17le Economic Value of Water
<br />Quality, the principal parameters of water
<br />quality were found to be TDS, hardness and
<br />chloride ion concentration. TDS was found to af-
<br />fect bottled water purchases but not purchases
<br />of other bottled beverages. Soap and detergent
<br />use was correlated to hardness, and high
<br />chloride increased corrosivity. Damage to cloth-
<br />ing, landscaping, and plumbing repairs in the
<br />home did not correlate to water quality.22 On
<br />the other hand, the 1%7 Black and Veatch
<br />report, Economic Effects of Mineral Content ill
<br />Municipal Water Supplies, concluded that
<br />mineralized water did reduce the useful life of
<br />fabrics and various home appliances and fIx-
<br />tures, and increased the use of soaps and deter-
<br />gents. This report does caution that the specific
<br />mix of minerals a water supply must be con-
<br />sidered, not simply the presence of mineralsP
<br />
<br />As is true of many of the studies, the
<br />Orange County Water District's 1972 Water
<br />Quality and Consumer Costs reviewed the
<br />literature. They looked at DeBoer, et aI., (1961)
<br />on use of detergents; Leeds, Hill, and Jewett,
<br />
<br />20Metropolitan Water District of Southern California, ~ 6 (1986), p. 3.
<br />
<br />21Califocnia Department oeWalee Resources, Southern District. C.OMumer Costs of W::lt~r Ouali\)' in Domestic Walt'!r
<br />I Js~_1 llmpnr. A-rl'A, Los Angeles: author, June 1978.
<br />
<br />22Metcalf and Eddy, Engineers, Tht! Frnnnmir Vallie of Water Ollality, Washington, D.C.: Office of Saline Water,
<br />January 1972, pp. t7-18.
<br />
<br />23D1ack and Veatch, El'onomir F.ffe"ls pp. 3-4.
<br />
|