Laserfiche WebLink
<br />34 Estimating Economic Impacts of Salinity... <br /> <br />l'V <br />-.l <br />l- <br />i-" <br /> <br />Health Services to set standard performance <br />levels for water treatment systems and requires <br />that systems be certified before sale. The other <br />law makes illegal the practice of making false <br />statements about the quality of tap water or to <br />overstate the effectiveness of treatment systems <br />offered for sale or rental.20 <br /> <br />Articles, such as "Should Tap Water Be For <br />Drinking," in the September 1986 California <br />Magazille have focussed concern on toxic con- <br />tamination of drinking water while recognizing <br />that many consumers seem to prefer the taste of <br />bottled water. A September 8, 1986, article in <br />the Riverside Press-Enterprise is headlined "Bot- <br />tled Water-Sales Soaring With Contamination <br />Scares." The article notes that while California's <br />bottled water purchases remain high, consumers <br />elsewhere in the country are buying more bottled <br />water as they begin to fear their tap water is con- <br />taminated. Still, it is clear that taste, or percep- <br />tion of better taste, plays a role in the consump- <br />tion of bottled water. It is less clear that the <br />taste perception is related to salinity since bot- <br />tied water sales are among the highest in the <br />country in Los Angeles County which receives <br />very little Colorado River water and is generally <br />supplied with low TDS water. Orange County <br />and the rest of Southern California are much <br />more widely supplied with Colorado River water <br />and more saline groundwater, yet taste is a sig- <br />nificantly lower factor in bottled water purchases <br />according to the survey's results. <br /> <br />Costs of bottled water can be linked to <br />salinity damages insofar as salinity is propor- <br />tional to hardness, which causes increases in <br />home water softening that affects taste, or when <br />salinity is itself so high as to cause noticeable <br />taste effects. Usually, that level cannot be deter- <br />mined without reference to a more complete <br />range of water constituents. However, the <br />proportional TDS!hardness relationship found in <br />Colorado River water does not hold in some <br />areas served by local water supplies. Water <br />hardness, which causes more home water <br /> <br />softening, changes "the content and taste of <br />water unfavorably and thus contribute(sJ to <br />wider use of bottled water.,,21 <br /> <br />Types of Economic Damages <br />to Households <br /> <br />A number of previous studies have inves- <br />tigated the relationship between water quality <br />and consumer costs. As discussed above, there <br />may not be any direct relationship between a <br />single water constituent and damage to a <br />household item. Even so, most of these studies <br />have singled out TDS or hardness as water con- <br />stituents that are known to cause damage and <br />also are usually identified in the samples of study <br />area water quality. <br /> <br />Previous studies. <br />In one of the earlier (1972) studies, Metcalf <br />and Eddy's 17le Economic Value of Water <br />Quality, the principal parameters of water <br />quality were found to be TDS, hardness and <br />chloride ion concentration. TDS was found to af- <br />fect bottled water purchases but not purchases <br />of other bottled beverages. Soap and detergent <br />use was correlated to hardness, and high <br />chloride increased corrosivity. Damage to cloth- <br />ing, landscaping, and plumbing repairs in the <br />home did not correlate to water quality.22 On <br />the other hand, the 1%7 Black and Veatch <br />report, Economic Effects of Mineral Content ill <br />Municipal Water Supplies, concluded that <br />mineralized water did reduce the useful life of <br />fabrics and various home appliances and fIx- <br />tures, and increased the use of soaps and deter- <br />gents. This report does caution that the specific <br />mix of minerals a water supply must be con- <br />sidered, not simply the presence of mineralsP <br /> <br />As is true of many of the studies, the <br />Orange County Water District's 1972 Water <br />Quality and Consumer Costs reviewed the <br />literature. They looked at DeBoer, et aI., (1961) <br />on use of detergents; Leeds, Hill, and Jewett, <br /> <br />20Metropolitan Water District of Southern California, ~ 6 (1986), p. 3. <br /> <br />21Califocnia Department oeWalee Resources, Southern District. C.OMumer Costs of W::lt~r Ouali\)' in Domestic Walt'!r <br />I Js~_1 llmpnr. A-rl'A, Los Angeles: author, June 1978. <br /> <br />22Metcalf and Eddy, Engineers, Tht! Frnnnmir Vallie of Water Ollality, Washington, D.C.: Office of Saline Water, <br />January 1972, pp. t7-18. <br /> <br />23D1ack and Veatch, El'onomir F.ffe"ls pp. 3-4. <br />