Laserfiche WebLink
<br />Economic Damages to Irrigated Agriculture 29 <br /> <br />N <br />""-l <br />C <br />~ <br /> <br />water table which has a detrimental effect on soil <br />structure and thus on crop production. The <br />saline groundwater also is drawn upward toward <br />the root zone through capillary action damaging <br />seedlings and even some mature plants. Tiling <br />also serves to keep land in production since salt <br />poisoning is most likely to occur on idle land due <br />to increased capillary action drawing the saline <br />water to the surface. <br /> <br />One irrigation district official says that land <br />levelling and sprinkler irrigation are increasingly <br />being used to obtain better use of the water and <br />to avoid problems with soil capillary action bring- <br />ing salt into the root zone. <br /> <br />Lengthy conversations with irrigation district <br />officials, project managers, and farmers in <br />Imperial, Riverside, and Yuma Counties gener- <br />ally support this position. It was consistently <br />pointed out that all irrigated agriculture requires <br />draining (at leaSt in the American southwest), <br />whether by installed systems, wells, or nature. In <br />the Lower Colorado River Basin, nature pro- <br />vides very little drainage, so man has intervened <br />with tiles or wells. This same type of logic ap- <br />plies to other types of advanced farming prac- <br />tices such as land levelling (level land being <br />easier to irrigate using flood or furrow irrigation). <br /> <br />The costs of drain tiles and the resulting <br />O&M, land-levelling, removal of land from <br />production and the type of crops planted have <br />often been attributed to saline irrigation water <br />without any scientific or empirical study to sup- <br />port the attribution. However, drain tiles also <br />serve to aid water conservation by reducing the <br />amount of water application required to <br />maintain salt balance, and soil conservation by <br />reducing opportunities for capillary action. <br /> <br />Other types of farm management costs have <br />been attributed by some to saline irrigation <br />water, e.g., installation or use of sprinkler irriga- <br />tion systems for crop germination and limited <br />use of drip irrigation systems. Farmers have also <br />made some soil modifications to the soil profile <br />through additions of organic matter, the use of <br />chemicals, and mechanical methods. These soil <br />modifications could, in part, be attributed to <br />salinity. <br /> <br />Although these remedies are expensive, <br />often labor intensive, and subject to climatologi- <br /> <br />cal effects or technological breakdown, these im- <br />provements likewise cannot be directly tied to <br />saline irrigation water. Rather these practices <br />appear to form a part of good farm management <br />for t he area, some undefmed portion of which <br />can be attributed to increasingly saline irrigation <br />waler. <br /> <br />,';1 <br /> <br />One Palo Verde Irrigation District farmer <br />says that "salt is a miniscule damage," possibly <br />because PVID has better soil drainage than the <br />other major farming areas in the Lower Basin. <br />But, out of all the farmers and officials inter- <br />viewed over the course of 18 months, only one <br />farmer was willing to directly attribute some <br />costs to salinity, and he could not give any <br />clearly linked or defmed costs. While having <br />some germination problems caused by soil <br />salinity in combination with high temperatures or <br />heavy rain, and using portable sprinklers for <br />germination at a cost of $125 per acre, he still <br />finds the relationship between saline irrigation <br />water and non-crop damages to be "pretty <br />subtle." Drainage is clearly needed for farming <br />in the area, but he and all the other district offi- <br />cials and farmers are unwilling to say what per- <br />centage of the related factors (soil, groundwater, <br />weather, irrigation water, etc.) is responsible for <br />each type of farm practice. <br /> <br />J <br /> <br />.1 <br /> <br />Losses in crop production due to shilts in <br />cropping patterns. <br />Although increased salinity may have caused <br />some changes in cropping patterns, for example, <br />reducing the acreage planted in salt-sensitive <br />crops, not all changes in cropping pattern have <br />occurred solely because of salinity. Many of the <br />truck-garden type crops - beans, fresh <br />tomatoes, other vegetables - have been given <br />over to Mexican producers because they are too <br />labor intensive and therefore too expensive to <br />grow in the current U.S. farm labor market. <br /> <br />The annual reports published by the <br />Imperial County Agricultural Commissioner also <br />make repeated references to factors other than <br />salinity affecting cropping patterns. A major fac- <br />tor is changing crop prices. For example, in <br />1980 the market was "disastrous" for lettuce <br />while the costs of production continued to in- <br />crease at a record pace, so lettuce acreage <br />dropped. In 1984 the cotton market was in <br />decline and sizable areas of lettuce were planted <br />in Arizona instead of in California. In 1982 <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />11 <br /> <br />i <br />i <br />1 <br />