Laserfiche WebLink
<br />20 Estimating Economic Impacts of Salinity... <br /> <br />N <br />en <br />w <br />00 <br /> <br />Salinity concentrations at Imperial Dam <br />decreased steadily from 1970-79, reflecting a <br />buffering of annual fluctuations in salinity caused <br />by nearly 50 million acre-feet (mal) of reservoir <br />storage. Salinity dropped notably in 1980 as <br />Hoover Dam discharges increased to 11.1 maf, <br />diluting the salinity at Imperial Dam temporarily. <br />With more normal flows in the river in 1981 and <br />1982, the salinity levels rebounded slightly. <br />Higher releases from Hoover and Glen Canyon <br />Dams in 1983 and 1984, caused by record <br />breaking reservoir inflows, caused salinity at Im- <br />perial Dam to drop again. With nearly 50 maf <br />of high quality water in storage, salinity at <br />Imperial remained relatively low in 1985 and <br />1986.6 <br /> <br />The salinity projections between 1987 and <br />2010, shown in Figures 3-5, result from projec- <br />tions of depletions and salt pickups caused by <br />Colorado River Basin development. These <br />projections are based on the historic water sup- <br />ply and on estimates of future depletions of <br />water from the Upper and Lower Basins reflect- <br />ing irrigation, transbasin diversions, municipal <br />and industrial uses, evaporation, and uses in <br />mineral development? <br /> <br />The steady increases in salinity levels fore- <br />casted in Figures 3-5 are based on the level of <br />development anticipated to occur by 2010. At <br />that time, the salinity at Imperial Dam is ex- <br />pected to reach about 963 mgiL of total dis- <br />solved solids (TDS). The computer programs <br />used in the CRSS are based on certain assump. <br />tions: complete mixing, steady-state transport of <br />both water and TDS, and no losses of salinity <br />due to chemical precipitation or salt stratifica- <br />tion within the river/reservoir system.S <br /> <br />Salinity of Metropolitan Water <br />Supplies In the Lower Basin <br /> <br />Determination of the TDS level of delivered <br />municipal and industrial water supplies in the <br /> <br />lower Colorado River Basin is difficult at best. <br />Much of the water used is a blend of Colorado <br />River water and other water supplies- <br />groundwater, surface water from northern <br />California or from the Salt and VerdeRivers,etc. <br />In addition, salinity is not regularly monitored <br />under local water quality regulations and is there- <br />fore measured only infrequently. Records of <br />TDS levels usually are not found charted with <br />consistency. Further, the number of water pur- <br />veying agencies in the Lower Basin is several <br />hundred, each with different sources of supply, <br />blending activities, and reporting standards. <br />Typically, TDS levels vary geographically within <br />a water supply agency's service area, and also <br />vary over time due to fluctuations in distributing <br />supplies from different sources with different <br />TDS levels. The best any researcher can do <br />without months of detailed record searches is to <br />sample and estimate the average systemwide <br />TDS for some major metropolitan areas and for <br />a few subareas within them. <br /> <br />This is the approach selected for this study, <br />primarily because of constraints on project <br />resources. In Arizona and Nevada it is possible <br />to estimate what the future blend of water might <br />be since Colorado River water will be added to <br />existing and well-identified local water supplies. <br />In southern California, estimates of future <br />blended water are not possible because of the <br />uncertain status of State Water Project supplies <br />that will be imported from the north, and be- <br />cause of the more complex possibilities involved <br />in blending and distributing water from the <br />Colorado River and a variety of local surface <br />and groundwater sources. More or less use of <br />State water will affect the ultimate TDS level, as <br />will the future quality of such State water. <br /> <br />Table 4 provides the best available data on <br />current and (where possible) estimated TDS <br />levels for the bulk of the municipal and indus- <br />trial water supply in the lower Colorado River <br />Basin. It should be noted that 1984-85 was a <br />period of unprecedented high flows in the river, <br /> <br />6 A more complete discussion of historical and current salinity conditions in the Colorado River can be found in Part V of <br />Department of the Interior, Ollali(y or WSlt~r C'.olomdn River Ha1llin Pmur:&.li: R~nn'l't No 12 Washington, D.C.: January <br />]985, pp. 23-29. <br /> <br /> <br />7Details of future development assumptions on which the salinity projections are based can be found in ibid., pp. 30-60. <br /> <br /> <br />BOetails of the CRSS and the assumptions on which salinity projections are based can be found in ibid., pp. 100-105. <br />