Laserfiche WebLink
<br />4 Estimating Economic Impacts of Salinity... <br /> <br />~ <br />m <br />QQ; <br />~ <br /> <br />unpleasant taste. Water hardness is most likely <br />to be an incentive to water softening, which in <br />turn can affect the corrosivity of the water. The <br />exchange of sodium for calcium ions during soft- <br />ening creates an even more unpleasant taste, <br />stimulating the expensive purchase of bottled <br />water. Both water salinity and water hardness <br />can cause damages, and since they are so closely <br />interrelated in Colorado River water, it is not <br />necessary to distinguish the effects of these <br />specific constituents. <br /> <br />Since some water damage to household ap- <br />pliances or utensils has been shown to occur at <br />salinity levels as low as 50 mgIL TDS, no parti- <br />cular threshold limit can be assigned. Instead, <br />comparative statistics on useful life, from all <br />available secondary data, are combincd with <br />selected baseline TDS values to attribute a <br />reasonable amount of such damage to salinity of <br />Colorado River water. This same procedure is <br />applied to physical damages that might be in- <br />curred by water supply and wastewater treat- <br />ment agencies. The fact that some damage <br />begins to occur at very low TDS levels creates a <br />further problem of attribution to Colorado River <br />water, but this is basically overcome by attribut- <br />ing only incremental damage to the higher <br />salinity of the Colorado River. <br /> <br />One new area of damage that can be confi- <br />dently attributed was uncovered during research. <br />According to data from the automobile industry, <br />damage to cooling systems (radiators) hegins at <br />100 mgIL TDS, and is a significant source of <br />salinity-related economic cost. Another area of <br />economic cost is less clearly attributable, but still <br />closely tied to the effects of saline or hard water <br />- the purchase of bottled water. Some data <br />are available that delineate a relationship <br />between TDS/hardness and bottled water pur- <br />chases, but the relationship is not clcar-cut <br />because of other influences - such as advertis- <br />ing - on consumer behavior. <br /> <br />The authors approached the dilemma on <br />causes of household damages by arraying the <br />data on damage and useful life (where available) <br />from previous studies of water quality-related <br />consumer damages. These data were subjected <br />to computer-based regression analysis which <br />derived formulas and generated curves over the <br />study TDS range. The annual dollar damages to <br />households in the metropolitan areas (including <br /> <br />business and commercial uses not related to in- <br />dustrial processes) using all or part Colorado <br />River water are presented in ranges. Based on <br />runs of the computer program, using alternated <br />baseline salinity levels and the 1976-1985 average <br />salinity level of the Colorado River, damage in <br />1986 dollars ranges from a high of $637.6 million <br />to a low damage estimate of $156.1 million. <br />These annual damages range from $64.76 to <br />$108.81 per household. <br /> <br />Damages to Water/Wastewater <br />Utilities <br /> <br />Damages to water and wastewater utilities <br />were calculated from reductions in the useful life <br />of system facilities and equipment, caused by in- <br />creased corrosion and scale that occur in saline <br />conditions. These damages were determined on <br />the basis of the useful life information, popula- <br />tion projections, and replacement cost of various <br />treatment and distribution facilities affected by <br />salinity deterioration. Annual damage is calcu- <br />lated by dividing capital investment cost per <br />capita by useful life at a predicted TDS level. <br />The annual cost to various Lower Colorado <br />River Basin utilities, depending on the baseline <br />used for measurement, is $3.2 million to $22.8 <br />million, or from $1.34 to $3.88 per household. <br /> <br />Damages to Utilities from <br />Policy/Regulation <br /> <br />This particular area of damage is not repre- <br />sented in the computer model because no histori- <br />calor basinwide data yet have been found other <br />than those presented by the Santa Ana water- <br />shed in Southern California. The Santa Ana <br />watershed has been using Colorado River water <br />as a substantial part of its supply for a number of <br />years; and, since the adoption of two California <br />Regional Water Quality Control Board regula- <br />tions, the Santa Ana River Watershed Project <br />Authority has been addressing salinity as part of <br />its overall water planning function. <br /> <br />One regulation requires that water dis- <br />charged from Riverside County, either in an <br />open channel or through groundwater recharge, <br />not exceed approximately 600 mgIL TDS. If it <br />does, more water must be provided for dilution, <br />the discharge must be treated, or the discharge <br />