Laserfiche WebLink
<br />I <br />I <br />I <br /> <br />Executive Summary <br /> <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br /> <br />making procedures, either in the Principles and Guidelines or in the <br />agency regulations, should be considered for environmental restoration <br />and recovery projects. The Bureau of Reclamation should consider <br />either modifying its existing regulations pertaining to planning and <br />environmental restoration projects or developing new regulations <br />comparable to those. already completed by the Corps of Engineers for <br />environmental restoration projects. This would permit the two major <br />federal water agencies to at least have comparable planning <br />procedures and requirements for environmental restoration projects. <br /> <br />3. The federal agencies need to develop better tools to provide technical <br />support to the states in resolving water conflicts. Fundamental to <br />solving many of the water resources conflicts in the Platte River basin <br />is the development ofa recovery program acceptable to the water <br />users, federal agencies, environmentalists, and states. A model ofthe <br />Platte River basin, including the alluvium, is a necessary tool <br />required for developing a successful recovery program for the Platte <br />River. Such a model, which all three states and the federal agencies <br />would have to accept in order to make the model effective, would <br />provide a vehicle for investigating and specifying operation and <br />development plans capable of providing habitat flows to the Big Bend <br />area. Development of the Colorado River Decision Support System for <br />use in the Colorado River Endangered Fish Recovery Program <br />provides an example of the importance of a decision support system in <br />a recovery program. In order to be acceptable to all three states, such <br />a flow model or decision support system would need to be developed <br />cooperatively by the three states together with the federal agencies. <br />Such a cooperative effort would require resolving some of the distrust <br />that has existed between the states and federal agencies and that has <br />prevented development of a Platte River flow model acceptable to all <br />three states and the federal agencies in the past. <br /> <br />Another major contribution to development of a successful recovery <br />program for the endangered species in the Platte River would be the <br />establishment of more reliable quantitative linkages between flow <br />characteristics and the response of individual species and their <br />habitats. Substantial work has already been conducted by the <br />U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service to develop quantitative estimates of the <br />river flows and restored acres needed to protect threatened and <br />endangered species. Much of this work was conducted under the <br />auspices of the Platte River Management Joint Study with the <br />involvement of water users and environmentalists. The goal of <br /> <br />Xl <br />