Laserfiche WebLink
<br />) <br /> <br />) <br /> <br />.'101'5414'2' Groundwater Model Development Report <br /> <br />Oct. 11, 2001 <br /> <br />Table of Contents <br /> <br />Executive Summary <br />1.0 Introduction.... .. ..... ....... .. .... ..... I <br />2.0 SB.74 Model Assumptions and Limitations..... ........ 3 <br />2.1 Stream-Alluvial AquiferlBedrock Aquifer Interactions................. .. ....... 3 <br />2.2 Consideration of Aquifer Interbeds in Regional Groundwater Model.......... 4 <br />3.0 Background.. ....................... ..... .................................5 <br />3.1 Groundwater Model Objectives and Requirements........ ............. .... 5 <br />4.0 Comparative Analysis for Handling Aquifer Interbeds in Regional <br />Groundwater Model..... ....... ......................... 7 <br />4.1 Regional Groundwater Model Comparative Analysis Approach............. 7 <br />4.1,1 Scenarios Considered............ ........................... ........................... 8 <br />4.1,2 Model Set-up (Boundary and Pumping Conditions) Common <br />to All Scenarios Investigated .....'''''''' ................. ..........................................8 <br />4.1,3 Base Case (Single Layer) Model Set-up................. .................. ............. .9 <br />4.1.4 Layered Models........................................... ............................... 9 <br />4.1.5 Vertical Conductance Sensitivity Analysis... ................... .... 11 <br />4,2 Results of Comparative Analysis.................. ............ ................. 11 <br />4.2.1 Areal Head ~istributions ....................... ...... ............. .. 12 <br />4.2.2 Well Hydrographs.............................................................. 12 <br />4.2.3 Vertical Head Distributions........................................... ................n. 13 <br />4.3 Summary and Conclusions of Regional Model Comparative Analysis.............14 <br />5.0 Preliminary Review ofS8-74 Groundwater Model................ ................................15 <br />5,1 S8-74 Model Review................................................................................. 15 <br />6.0 Screening of Hydrogeologic Data for South Metro Area. ................................... . 17 <br />6.1 Data Overview and Screening Methodology......... ...................................... 17 <br />6.2 Screening Methodologies ...................................... ..................... .."'''"" ..............18 <br />6.3 Screening Results ................. ................ ................................ ......... ....... .............20 <br />6.3.1 New Data vs SB-74 MDdel Values: Aquifer Tops & BottomB...................21 <br />6.3.2 New Data vs S8-74 Model Values: Hydraulic Conductivity.....................23 <br />6.4 Screening Implications.................. ...... ..... ........... ................. """ ......... .............. ...25 <br />6.4.1 Aquifer Top and Bottom Elevations .........................................................25 <br />6.4.2 Hydraulic Cond uctivity........ ...'" ...... ............ .."" ..... ..... ...... ..................... ...26 <br />7.0 Groundwater Model Development Plan.............................................................c......28 <br />7.1 Incorporating Up-to-date S. Metro Data into Regional Groundwater <br /> <br />model.... ..... ..... ...... ... .... ...... ......... ..... ....... ........ ......... ....... ......... ...... ........... .......... ...29 <br />7.1.i Updating Aquifer Top and Bottom Elevations in Model...........................29 <br />7.1.2 Updating Hydraulic Conductivity Fields in Model...................................30 <br />7.2 Explicitly Addressing Limitations Inherent in S8-74 Approach.......................31 <br />7.3 Local Wen and Well-Field Analysis....................................................................32 <br />7.3,1 Subsurface Hydrologic Processes that Would Increase Local <br /> <br />Drawdowns ... ................... ............ ...... ........ ............... '"'''''''' ......... ....... ...... .33 <br />7.3.2 Recommendation for Local (WeJl and WeJl-Field) Analysis.....................34 <br />7.4 Summary of Model Development Approacb.......................................................35 <br />8.0 BibliograpbL.... ..................................................................................................... .36 <br />Appendix A <br /> <br />Hydrosphere Resource Consultants <br />1002 Walnut Suilc 200. Boulder, CO 80302 <br />PO Box 44S, Socorro, NM 87801 <br />