Laserfiche WebLink
<br />.-I <br />c- <br />C"', <br />N <br /> <br />C <br /> <br />can be compensated for by revenuos from the sale of secondary <br /> <br />energy and miscellaneous revenues from other sources. <br /> <br />Operation and Maintenanc~. <br /> <br />The estimation of the cost of operation and maintenance <br /> <br />for the pro,ject was reached through a careful study of the <br /> <br />f'our estimates made for the project, (U. S. B. R.; City of <br /> <br />1. A.; S. C. E.; 1/1. W. D.) taken in conjunction with the <br /> <br />historical costs as of record. <br /> <br />The amounts resulting from these four estimates are as <br /> <br />follows: <br /> <br />U. S. B. R., as revised, see <br />transcript page 1716 <br /> <br />$648,380 <br />235,543 <br />318,758 <br />313,890 <br /> <br />City of 10s Angeles <br /> <br />Southern California Edison <br /> <br />Metropolitan Water District <br /> <br />An examination of the details of these estimates shows <br /> <br />that they are not comparable due to divergence of opinions as <br /> <br />to the inclusion of certain items, different methods of treating <br /> <br />the cost of emergency protection, etc. The more important of <br /> <br />these items relate to the cost of' 00oration and maintenance of <br /> <br />the powerhouse structure, the costs of schools, guide service <br /> <br />and protection, (emergency and normal), and Boulder City public <br /> <br />services. <br /> <br />It should be noted that the estimate made by the U. S. B. R. <br /> <br />is responsive to present existing law, policy and r~gulations <br /> <br />covering these various i.tems on which there is divergence of opinion. <br /> <br />16 <br />